-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 15 April 2004 01:38, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> There is no need to modify the software to support this effort.
Actually, I'm still waiting on clarification of my last post, to see if this
is really the case...
- --
Lee
ges like
Chinese, Pali, etc. Could be wrong on that, though.
Anyway... thanks for your thoughts everyone. Given the above issues, and the
depth of feeling expressed so far, I think I'll see what can be done
independently for now.
All the best with SWORD :D
- --
Lee Braiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
o opinions on a fork so far, but it MAY be agreeable to most of
the group. In that case, would you find it acceptable if none of your
efforts were contained in the fork?
- --
Lee Braiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key ID: FC69B75C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
se GPL gives anyone
the right to do this, but did you INTEND it to provide that right? :)
- --
Lee Braiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key ID: FC69B75C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAd+RbxstRDPxpt1wRAklkAJwLhbvZyB44gy7PasKdrEdT4AFD3gCfZlAV
tD3Ef4UA8qWQXX/9I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I wonder if what your opinions are on the texts of other faiths? Any
objections to modifying SWORD so that it's useful to a wider audience?
- --
Lee Braiden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG Key ID: FC69B75C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
