Re: [sword-devel] BPBible Portable - now official at PortableApps.com

2008-10-04 Thread Ben Morgan
Yes, I know about that. The LXX uses a packard: prefix, but seems to actually use robinsons. I could easily put in support for packard; but packard shouldn't be used for new modules, so there's not all that much point in supporting it. God Bless, Ben ---

Re: [sword-devel] BPBible Portable - now official at PortableApps.com

2008-10-03 Thread David Troidl
Ben Morgan wrote: > This has been talked about, but I just added it to the issue tracker > (http://code.google.com/p/bpbible/issues/detail?id=24). It should be > in 0.4 > > Note that you won't get proper display of Hebrew as the wxHTML control > doesn't support RToL languages properly. > > God B

Re: [sword-devel] BPBible Portable - now official at PortableApps.com

2008-10-03 Thread Ben Morgan
This has been talked about, but I just added it to the issue tracker ( http://code.google.com/p/bpbible/issues/detail?id=24). It should be in 0.4 Note that you won't get proper display of Hebrew as the wxHTML control doesn't support RToL languages properly. God Bless, Ben

Re: [sword-devel] BPBible Portable - now official at PortableApps.com

2008-10-02 Thread David Troidl
Chris Morgan wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm happy that I can now tell you all that BPBible Portable 0.3.1 is > now an official PortableApps.com Application > :-) It's now available for download. > Here is the news announcement >

[sword-devel] BPBible Portable - now official at PortableApps.com

2008-10-02 Thread Chris Morgan
Hi all, I'm happy that I can now tell you all that BPBible Portable 0.3.1 is now an official PortableApps.com Application :-) It's now available for download. Here is the news announcement, and its application page is here