On 04/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> The only repository not for general public use is not listed in
> masterRepoList.conf, and that's the experimental repository.
>
> The attic repositories are definitely intended for the public to use. If
> users care to, they can downgrade fro
This site wasn't on my radar, but I find it very useful:
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Commentary_Modules
Many of these (well documented) issues appear easily fixed. For example
the 'emptyvss' issues are likely simple problems to fix. It appears the
purpose of this pag
On 03/01/13 13:04, Chris Little wrote:
I would suggest that you quit presenting CrossWire Beta as "CrossWire
2". I know Apple doesn't want 'beta' showing up in the delivered app,
but I presume you can sidestep this by loading from masterRepoList.conf.
I would second that. Beta was meant to be
On 1/3/2013 4:03 AM, Nic Carter wrote:
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
that was reasonably good has long been moved to oth
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
> repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
> that was reasonably good has long been moved to other repositories. So the
> content r
On 1/1/2013 7:27 PM, Nic Carter wrote:
Heya all,
Just a quick question about beta modules.
Currently we have the wiki page that is meant to be where we "report" problems.
I have been emailed again about the Barnes Notes module and looking at the entry for it
on the wiki at
http://crosswire.o
I see from my facebook feeds that Illya Antonenko (osnova.com) has recently
published Barnes as a Kindle edition (& for other e-book platforms too).
He generally uses OSIS, so he must have made or edited an OSIS source file
for Barnes.
Being friendly disposed towards CrossWire, it may be worth as
On 02/01/13 10:17, David Haslam wrote:
Would it not be feasible to correct the *Barnes* commentary module by using
mod2imp, edit the output IMP file, and then rebuild using imp2vs ?
I have not tried it, but I would think this might massively increase the
size of a module with verse ranges as
When beta modules don't get corrected for years, it's probably because other
matters have much higher priority,
and most CrossWire volunteers have a day-job or other full-time commitments.
cf. Those of us who are retired are few and far between.
Would it not be feasible to correct the *Barnes* com
Heya all,
Just a quick question about beta modules.
Currently we have the wiki page that is meant to be where we "report" problems.
I have been emailed again about the Barnes Notes module and looking at the
entry for it on the wiki at
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Co
10 matches
Mail list logo
