Re: [sword-devel] Colophons

2016-02-01 Thread David Haslam
All the Pauline epistles have a colophon. The only thing that scholars dispute is the Pauline authorship of Hebrews, but that doesn't affect the fact that all historic editions of the KJV before [say] 1850, include the colophons. Aside: One modern publisher omits them out of principle, namely, the

Re: [sword-devel] Colophons

2016-01-31 Thread Greg Hellings
I strongly agree with Troy. It keeps the markup semantic and the import minimally-transformative. On Jan 31, 2016 2:04 PM, "Troy A. Griffitts" wrote: > Certainly agree we should set these off so as not to be mistaken with > canonical text. I would prefer simply adding appropriate default styling

Re: [sword-devel] Colophons

2016-01-31 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Certainly agree we should set these off so as not to be mistaken with canonical text. I would prefer simply adding appropriate default styling to our renderers. Who knows how some frontends might want to render these. Adding a line break presumes a styling and might make it difficult to remove t

[sword-devel] Colophons

2016-01-31 Thread DM Smith
The KJV has colophons after the last chapter in most of the pauline epistles. It is marked up within a …. The SWORD module has this appended to the last verse. Right now, Xiphos and Bible Desktop are showing it inline in the last verse. No line break. I don’t think this looks good. How should