> Von: "Jaak Ristioja"
> Sure. Here you go: https://www.crosswire.org/tracker/browse/API-189
Thanks - also for the other one.
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instruc
On 19.10.2016 10:43, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
>> Von: "Jaak Ristioja"
>
>> It seems that the postfix ++/-- operators defined in SWMODULE_OPERATORS
>> have prefix ++/-- semantics,
>
> Can you put this into the bug tracker, too?
Sure. Here you go: https://www.crosswire.org/tracker/browse/API-189
> Von: "Jaak Ristioja"
> It seems that the postfix ++/-- operators defined in SWMODULE_OPERATORS
> have prefix ++/-- semantics,
Can you put this into the bug tracker, too?
Thanks!
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.cr
Hello!
It seems that the postfix ++/-- operators defined in SWMODULE_OPERATORS
have prefix ++/-- semantics, i.e. (module++) is equivalent to
(module.increment(1), module). This is probably not the intended behavior.
Blessings,
J
___
sword-devel mailing
