Re: [sword-devel] Minimum Version conf entry

2015-12-26 Thread David Haslam
Oh - yes - indeed, but those are not so commonly encountered. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Minimum-Version-conf-entry-tp4655537p4655544.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [sword-devel] Minimum Version conf entry

2015-12-26 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Sat, 2015-12-26 at 08:22 -0800, David Haslam wrote: > I hope you're not duplicating existing wiki content. There are other features which influence the minimum number one shoudl give a module - image formats added, ruby etc etc. Peter ___ sword-dev

Re: [sword-devel] Minimum Version conf entry

2015-12-26 Thread David Haslam
I've only used it in relation to the list already given in http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification I hope you're not duplicating existing wiki content. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Minimum-Version-conf-entry-tp4655537p4655539.html

[sword-devel] Minimum Version conf entry

2015-12-26 Thread Peter von Kaehne
The reason for this entry is to protect old frontends from new modules.  The problem with this is that probably no one I have ever asked has a complete and reliable overview of which "minimal version" reflects which specific additional feature set. As a result some modules have been added which p