On 4/24/09, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Quoting DM Smith :
>
> > I like your suggestion. Give that CC are legal licenses, it appears
> > that this summary is complete, perhaps drafted by lawyers :0
> >
>
> The problem with it is that it's too long. I don't want to give a legally
> correct statement, o
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
... The point is to tell shortly what they can do: obtain and use it
freely for almost any purpose. AND that distributing is allowed within
certain limits. My clause about distributing is too limited as was
pointed out. However, it's not legally binding and it still tells
On Apr 24, 2009, at 2:48 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
Would it be good idea to put a notice with licence agreement in each
frontend which says that "this software can be obtained with no
cost, if you have paid a large sum you may have been fooled"?"
Yes. How about part of the banner/splash an
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen
wrote:
> Anyways, even if we forget the exact wording, the other point was even more
> important. Would the frontend developers like to use this kind of statement,
> crafted carefully, in all frontends? We don't know yet how our apps will be
>
Quoting DM Smith :
I like your suggestion. Give that CC are legal licenses, it appears
that this summary is complete, perhaps drafted by lawyers :0
The problem with it is that it's too long. I don't want to give a
legally correct statement, only a short and easily understandable
statement
I like your suggestion. Give that CC are legal licenses, it appears
that this summary is complete, perhaps drafted by lawyers :0
-- DM
On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/4/24 DM Smith :
I appreciate and understand that we (myself included) don' like it
when
free/Fr
2009/4/24 DM Smith :
>
> I appreciate and understand that we (myself included) don' like it when
> free/Free software is sold, especially when it is our effort, but the GPL
> clearly allows for that. Even we can do that!
Totally agree
> The GLP requires that the user be told that the software sou
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen
"BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and
use (but not distribute) the program for personal, private, public
or commercial purposes without restrictions.You can give away or
distribute
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
>
>
> 2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen
>>
>> "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but
>> not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial
>> purposes without restrictions.You can give away or
2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen
> "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but
> not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial
> purposes without restrictions.You can give away or distribute the program if
> you also distribute the corresponding so
Would it be good idea to put a notice with licence agreement in each
frontend which says that "this software can be obtained with no cost, if
you have paid a large sum you may have been fooled"?
Usually applications have an About dialog. It could be put there. More
importantly, it could be inc
11 matches
Mail list logo
