Mike Hart writes:
> Perhaps if the section were renamed something less offensive it might
> contain more works. Sectarian? or Unorthodox?
The conf directive is in fact...
Category=Cults / Unorthodox / Questionable Material
...as can be seen by actually looking at the *.conf for JST and Dia
On 11/06/11 22:04, Mike Hart wrote:
> The title word "Cult" on that section seems to prevent any living translator
> or group from voluntarily placing their version in that list.
I have no problem with that.
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-
The title word "Cult" on that section seems to prevent any living translator or
group from voluntarily placing their version in that list.
Perhaps if the section were renamed something less offensive it might contain
more works. Sectarian? or Unorthodox? Nobody wants to consider their own
g
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Mike Hart wrote:
> Based on the text seeming to follow the Assembly de Yahweh's theology and not
> following any known Greek manuscript, I'm going to have to suggest it is
> flawed enough that it needs significant revision before it could be hosted by
> Crosswir
I think it important to state here that this is not just about a statement of
faith on the website.
The problem is that the RVR2011 appears to be intentionally mistranslated to
support the theology described there. More specifically, John 1:1 reads
"EN el principio era el Verbo, y el Verbo era
