Re: [sword-devel] Still asking about Matthew 16/WEB/Sword program

2004-01-26 Thread Michael Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 07:17 24-01-04, Chris Little wrote: >On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >> I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering. >> >> When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using >> the >> Sword program (version 1.5.6;

Re: [sword-devel] Still asking about Matthew 16/WEB/Sword program

2004-01-23 Thread Klaus R. H. Walther
Hello On Friday, 23. Januar 2004 22:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming? > I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the > problem. Now I don't understand if you're saying there is no future > version of Sword

Re: [sword-devel] Still asking about Matthew 16/WEB/Sword program

2004-01-23 Thread JPKlingon
<> Does that mean there is known to be a problem in this passage? As I noted, it is text that is there, since search finds it. <> Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming? I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the problem. Now I don't u

Re: [sword-devel] Still asking about Matthew 16/WEB/Sword program

2004-01-23 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering. > > When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the > Sword program (version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7 > released?) I get ... nothing. This means that in a parallel

[sword-devel] Still asking about Matthew 16/WEB/Sword program

2004-01-23 Thread JPKlingon
I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering. When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the Sword program (version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7 released?) I get ... nothing. This means that in a parallel passage (say KJV+WEB) it won't show anything past MT