-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 07:17 24-01-04, Chris Little wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering.
>>
>> When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using
>> the
>> Sword program (version 1.5.6;
Hello
On Friday, 23. Januar 2004 22:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming?
> I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the
> problem. Now I don't understand if you're saying there is no future
> version of Sword
<>
Does that mean there is known to be a problem in this passage? As I noted, it is text
that is there, since search finds it.
<>
Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming?
I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the problem.
Now I don't u
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering.
>
> When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the
> Sword program (version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7
> released?) I get ... nothing. This means that in a parallel
I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering.
When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the Sword program
(version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7 released?) I get ... nothing.
This means that in a parallel passage (say KJV+WEB) it won't show anything past MT