On 2015-02-11, 09:06 GMT, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> Is gcc5 intended to be mandatory in f22?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/ChangeSet#GCC5 ...
> well, “mandatory” seems a bit loaded word, but yes, gcc5 will be
> what you get as gcc in F22.
Which also means that Rawhide (which is now
On 02/11/2015 04:06 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> I think you are right. In case you want to file a bug
I was beginning to file a bug, but then looked more closely at the build
log.
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.0.0/map:60:0,
from ../src/main/modulecache.hh:45,
On 2015-02-11, 00:20 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> On 02/10/2015 01:25 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> xiphos-4.0.0-3.fc22.src.rpm
>> this package failed to build because the limit of the
>> instantiation depth has been reached.
> Considering that I have no environment in which to test th
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>
> Is gcc5 intended to be mandatory in f22?
Fedora 22 will ship GCC 5:
http://developerblog.redhat.com/2015/02/10/gcc-5-in-fedora/
--
Baiju M
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.
On 02/10/2015 01:25 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> xiphos-4.0.0-3.fc22.src.rpm
> this package failed to build because the limit of the
> instantiation depth has been reached.
Considering that I have no environment in which to test this, it's not
very informative. Is there a build log?
A
Hi,
I am not sure whether you are aware of Fedora’s mass-build test
of emerging gcc 5.0
(http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/204517),
which resulted among many other failures with:
xiphos-4.0.0-3.fc22.src.rpm
this package failed to build because the limit of the
