On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 19:12 +, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> 1 seems easy for a frontend. 2 seems a nightmare so we have to assist
> them as much as possible. I haven't even started to imagine how
> frontend developers feel the display logic should work. Would be
> interested to sample some of
I would like to chime in briefly with a real world case of option 2
below that I am dealing with right now. I am working on a paper on the
Psalms where versification varies quite a bit between versions
(Leningrad, LXX, and KJV, etc.). I use both BibleTime and Logos because
both offer features I
On 09/11/10 19:12, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> To answer this, I believe we need to outline our use cases. I can think
> of 3:
>
> 1) A user is viewing a verse, say Ps 95:5 in the KJV, and then wants to
> switch Bibles to one with an alternate v11n, say the LXX. Typically a
> frontend will want to
Hey Konstantin,
Quick comment right now to stir discussion among frontend developers:
On 11/09/2010 05:16 PM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote:
> 2. some verses point to ranges of verses. should i change bounds in
> this case (UpperBound())?
To answer this, I believe we need to outline our use cases
Dear Konstantin (and Chris),
The recent comment on sword-devel reminding me of this thread.
I have a few questions and don't want your work to be ignored because of
miscommunication. See below.
On 10/28/2010 09:14 AM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote:
> Hi, Troy.
>
>> V1 [abc]
>> V2 [abcd]
>> V3 [abc
Hi, Troy.
> V1 [abc]
> V2 [abcd]
> V3 [abce]
> where V1 is your chosen intermediate system (KJV or KJVA in your code),
> and the problem case comes when attempting to map V2.d to V3.e
My code will map V2[d] to V3[e] if they should be mapped otherwise
mapping data should mark both of them a
Just my first working code for stuff. I post it because going to make
content for Synodal. Someone would like to make content for any other
english-speaking-module-v11n, so it would be preferred to test such
mappings first.
Format from http://www.ccel.org/refsys/refsys.html looks good, but
On 10/3/2010 9:34 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
On 10/3/2010 6:19 PM, Robert Hunt wrote:
� �4/ Would your program be interested in taking advantage of such XML
� �lists?
� �5/ If not, would another format be helpful?
XML is fine; we can mak
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> On 10/3/2010 6:19 PM, Robert Hunt wrote:
>> 4/ Would your program be interested in taking advantage of such XML
>> lists?
>> 5/ If not, would another format be helpful?
>
> XML is fine; we can make converters. Our interest in usin
On 10/3/2010 6:19 PM, Robert Hunt wrote:
Dear all,
I've been investigating for the last two weeks about creating a small
open repository under the OpenScriptures banner for storing and
maintaining (and even documenting) XML lists of versification schemes
and international booknames, versificat
Dear all,
I've been investigating for the last two weeks about creating a
small open repository under the OpenScriptures banner for storing and
maintaining (and even documenting) XML lists of versification schemes
and international booknames, versification mappings, USFM and OSIS
booknames
I have a strong hunch that John Austin must have had to construct such a
mapping for http://code.google.com/p/xulsword/ xulsword .
His http://www.ibt.org.ru/english/bible/info_bible_en.htm MK application
for IBT supports seamless transition between KJV and RST v11ns, albeit for
just the 66 pro
> To me, this lack seems a major limitation.
We have been over that one already a few times.
A limitation, not a major one. And better than the current situation.
So it is progress. I say this as someone whose main Bible is in a av11n
While Bibles get forced into KJV the references get
messed
I would have thought that such a mapping was a fundamental part of support
for alternate versifications. Until the mapping is there and available
through the library in some way, front ends cannot link between Bibles with
different versifications: cross references can only work for one
versificati
I thought you were talking about creating the v11n definition. If you're
talking about a mapping from Synodal to other v11ns, then we wouldn't
have any way of using that information. Obviously, you're free to work
on it, but no one is currently doing anything to implement verse mapping
between
What do you mean? As i know there is no mapping between v11ns in Sword.
Chris Little писал(а) в своём письме Thu, 30 Sep
2010 00:21:13 +0400:
This has been available (in SVN) for a year.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
This has been available (in SVN) for a year.
--Chris
On 9/29/2010 8:58 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Von: Konstantin Maslyuk
Hi. I would write mapping system and mapping data for Synodal v11n, of
course if anyone from Sword Project heads want me to do it.
I think this would be wonderful if
> Von: Konstantin Maslyuk
> Hi. I would write mapping system and mapping data for Synodal v11n, of
> course if anyone from Sword Project heads want me to do it.
I think this would be wonderful if this is finally started.
Peter
--
GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99
Hi. I would write mapping system and mapping data for Synodal v11n, of
course if anyone from Sword Project heads want me to do it.
--
С уважением,
Konstantin mailto:kale...@mail.ru
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@cr
19 matches
Mail list logo
