On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 12:54:53 -1000
Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
Aloha nui,
> I use the actual Ethnologue/ISO 693-3 language code for the first 3
> characters of the module names in the eBible.org repository. To do otherwise
> increases the risk of collisions and the risk of confusing mysel
Thank you.
I use the actual Ethnologue/ISO 693-3 language code for the first
3 characters of the module names in the eBible.org repository. To
do otherwise increases the risk of collisions and the risk of
confusing myself. I could do like I do when matching up Bib
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:32:31 -1000
Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
Hi Michael,
About fraFOB1724, which is a module for the French Bible Ostervald, I think it
must be renamed to FreFOB:
- Fre is the recommended prefix for French modules.
- The Ostervald Bible was first made public in the year 1
FYI: The GlobalOptionFilters are names of code that are called in the order
that they appear.
— DM
> On Sep 1, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
> wrote:
>
> On 08/30/2015 10:26 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>> We should document this better in the wiki page.
>>
>> Currently there is ju
On 08/30/2015 10:26 PM, David Haslam
wrote:
We should document this better in the wiki page.
Currently there is just a brief note attached to OSISLemma.
Must precede OSISStrongs.
See http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#cite_ref-2
What is the backgr
We should document this better in the wiki page.
Currently there is just a brief note attached to OSISLemma.
Must precede OSISStrongs.
See http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#cite_ref-2
What is the background to this requirement?
Is it still valid?
David
--
View this messag
You are right, DM. I did understand.
Thanks for the clarification!
:-)
On 08/30/2015 05:37 PM, DM Smith wrote:
I think you misunderstand. If the lemma attribute has other kinds
of lemma then use the GlobalOptionFilter=OSISLemma.
Here is an OSIS file: https://ebible.org/Scriptures/eng-kjv_osis.zip
In fact, here are a multitude of OSIS files: https://ebible.org/Scriptures/.
On 08/30/2015 05:41 PM, DM Smith wrote:
That input should be OK. I’ll have to dig to see why. I may
On 08/29/2015 10:42 AM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
On 08/28/2015 10:18 PM, Kahunapule
Michael Johnson wrote:
At least as importantly,
how would Joe Average distinguish them?
Good question. Tha
That input should be OK. I’ll have to dig to see why. I may need an OSIS.xml
file to do the analysis. Could you put it somewhere I can download it?
It may take a few days for me to get to it. I’m prioritizing the release of
Bible Desktop and am in the process of testing the installers.
Thanks,
I think you misunderstand. If the lemma attribute has other kinds of lemma then
use the GlobalOptionFilter=OSISLemma. It is not dependent on the morph
attribute.
Here is an example from our KJV where OSISLemma is appropriate (new lines added
for ease of reading):
The
book
of the
generation
o
On 08/29/2015 10:31 AM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
On 08/28/2015 10:30 PM, Kahunapule
Michael Johnson wrote:
Should
I try to make the paragraph-beginning verse number placement
less odd?
When making modules, my perspect
Thank you. I'll trigger the OSISLemma
filter on the morphology tags.
On 08/28/2015 05:40 PM, DM Smith wrote:
Only use it if that attr has something other than Strong's
numbers.
Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;
Can I just say that there is probably a whole long list of duplications which
will need to be resolved at some point, in part by CrossWire dropping content,
in parts by eBible. I do not think it is a big deal.
Peter
Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 29 Aug 2015 21:50, Karl
On 08/28/2015 10:19 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> ou need to look at the fuller title. WEBBE includes the
> Deuterocanon/Apocrypha. WEBUK doesn't.
Then Joe Average will fail to understand the difference. The naming
difference being isolated to "BE" (British Edition) vs. "UK" (um, that's
On 08/28/2015 10:18 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
>
>> At least as importantly, how would Joe Average distinguish them?
>
> Good question. That kind of depends on how much information is
> presented to Joe Average.
My point in asking is that their mere presence duplicates these modules,
cre
On 08/28/2015 11:40 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> Only use it if that attr has something other than Strong's numbers.
$ mod2imp engKJV2006 | grep -i lemma | sed -e 's/lemma="strong://g' |
grep -i lemma
$ mod2imp engKJV1769 | grep -i lemma | sed -e 's/lemma="strong://g' |
grep -i lemma
$
Neither module ha
On 08/28/2015 10:30 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> Should I try to make the paragraph-beginning verse number placement
> less odd?
When making modules, my perspective has always been that the preceding
verse specifies the paragraph /ending/, so that the vertical whitespace
is generated the
Only use it if that attr has something other than Strong's numbers.
Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
> On Aug 28, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson
> wrote:
>
>> On 08/28/2015 03:12 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> I just keep running into oddities as I look these over th
On 08/28/2015 03:12 PM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
I just keep running into oddities as I look
these over the first time, having only dealt previously with the
repo's ability to serve them properly.
Why does your KJV conf contain
On 08/28/2015 03:04 PM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
Are you aware of the odd placement of
paragraph-beginning verse#s in your modules?
Yes. I think it is an unintended result of my efforts to make verses
and paragraphs nest when practical. Tha
On 08/28/2015 02:49 PM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
As well, why do you have both WEBUK and
WEBBE, both of whose descriptions say "World English Bible
British Edition," and again, how would Joe Average make an
intelligent choice between the
On 08/28/2015 02:21 PM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
On 08/28/2015 04:40 PM, Kahunapule
Michael Johnson wrote:
The
engKJV1769, engKJV2006, and spaRV1909 look a lot better, now
How are your KJV modules distinguished from
th
I just keep running into oddities as I look these over the first time,
having only dealt previously with the repo's ability to serve them properly.
Why does your KJV conf contain "GlobalOptionFilter=OSISLemma" when there
appears to be no lemma content?
_
Are you aware of the odd placement of paragraph-beginning verse#s in
your modules?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
As well, why do you have both WEBUK and WEBBE, both of whose
descriptions say "World English Bible British Edition," and again, how
would Joe Average make an intelligent choice between them?
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://w
On 08/28/2015 04:40 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> The engKJV1769, engKJV2006, and spaRV1909 look a lot better, now
How are your KJV modules distinguished from those in Crosswire main repo?
At least as importantly, how would Joe Average distinguish them?
___
Aloha, Peter.
Actually, during a rebuild, neither my main site or the beta site
are "out", if all goes well. If all doesn't go so well, the beta
site might go down, but not the main site. Even a full rebuild is
done one module at a time, with all of the pie
28 matches
Mail list logo
