Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-03-07 Thread David Haslam
Now that the tracker's working again, I've created an issue about this *savlm* problem. See http://tracker.crosswire.org/browse/API-199 David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/lemma-only-xhtml-display-shows-no-lemmas-tp4656829p4656922.html Sent from the SW

Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-02-27 Thread David Haslam
Good example of programmers' gobbledegook leaking out into the real world, eh? Who'd've thunk it? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/lemma-only-xhtml-display-shows-no-lemmas-tp4656829p4656837.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble

Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-02-27 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/27/2017 03:22 PM, David Haslam wrote: > Anyone any idea what *savlm* signifies? "save lemma," evidently. grep savlm src/modules/filters/*.cpp src/modules/filters/osishtmlhref.cpp:SWBuf savelemma = tag.getAttribute("savlm"); src/modules/filters/osislatex.cpp:SWBuf savelemma =

Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-02-27 Thread David Haslam
All I know (being unaccustomed to compiling code since the days of Borland Turbo Pascal) is that *diatheke 4.7* was bundled with *Xiphos 4.0.4* for Windows. Anyone any idea what *savlm* signifies? Why does "-o l" output have *savlm=* where "-o nl" output has *lemma=* ? Still puzzled! Best rega

Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-02-26 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
All I know is I'm running latest SVN sword, freshly re-checked-out and recompiled just now. $ svn info Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /home/karl/src/bible/sword URL: https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk Relative URL: ^/trunk Repository Root: https://www.crosswire.org/svn/sword Repository UUI

Re: [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas

2017-02-26 Thread David Haslam
Just tried the same two command lines using diatheke.exe version 4.7 (in Windows 7 x64) First with just "-o l" Romans 1:1: : Paul, [sword-devel] lemma-only xhtml display shows no lemmas
$ diatheke -b KJV *-o l* -f xhtml -k rom.1.1 [ ... ] Romans 1:1: Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God, (KJV) No lemma content provided. By comparison, combined with Strong's: $ diatheke -b KJV *-o nl* -f xhtml -k rom.1.1 [ ... ] Romans 1:1: P