Re: [sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 12/16/2014 10:47 AM, David Haslam wrote: > What happens when you search the personal commentary for the expression > "^.+$" ? All verses. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Ins

Re: [sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-16 Thread David Haslam
What happens when you search the personal commentary for the expression "^.+$" ? -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/regex-search-for-tp4654325p4654339.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-16 Thread Peter Von Kaehne
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2014 um 13:57 Uhr Von: "Karl Kleinpaste" > I would still like to know why "." no longer works, why search answers with > every verse.  It appears that Sword thinks there's at least 1 character in > every verse, even when nothing has> been put in any but a ba

Re: [sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-16 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
I don't know why I didn't think to try this earlier, but I got the needed effect back using regex search for "..+", i.e. at least 2 characters. I would still like to know why "." no longer works, why search answers with every verse. It appears that Sword thinks there's at least 1 character in eve

Re: [sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-14 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
BTW, examples/cmdline/search demonstrates the problem. Change search type to 0, re-compile, and "./search Personal ." dumps all verses. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instruct

[sword-devel] regex search for "."

2014-12-14 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
As a favor to users of Personal commentary, for eons Xiphos has provided a "dump personal commentary" capability, which has been implemented under the hood as a regex search for "." in order to find exactly those verses in which something, anything, has been written down. The idea is that the user