Sorry Chris, I think they may have received your request after they sent
their messages as email servers tend to be slow in delivery.
-Dave O
Okay guys, I specifically asked that my email NOT be used as an excuse
for theological debates:
> NB:
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 13:27, you wrote:
> Okay guys, I specifically asked that my email NOT be used as an excuse
>
> for theological debates:
> > NB: any persons seeing this as an invitation to theological debate may
>
> argue amongst themselves at news://crosswire.org/crosswire.fireside.
>
>
Okay guys, I specifically asked that my email NOT be used as an excuse
for theological debates:
> NB: any persons seeing this as an invitation to theological debate may
argue amongst themselves at news://crosswire.org/crosswire.fireside.
So, that said, you have three options:
1) Move your discus
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 10:16, you wrote:
> >It is known from historical documents that Pilate never had the custom of
> >releasing a prisoner on pesach.
> >
> >>Is it possible that this information is only ``well-known'' with certain
> >>Judaic circles?
> >
> >No, it has even been reported on
>
>
>It is known from historical documents that Pilate never had the custom of
>releasing a prisoner on pesach.
>
>>Is it possible that this information is only ``well-known'' with certain
>>Judaic circles?
>>
>
>No, it has even been reported on the discovery channel.
>
Oh, well if it was on TV i
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 01:25, you wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2002 21:02, chris wrote:
> > On Monday 14 January 2002 06:49, you wrote:
> >> On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> > Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
> >>
> >> Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent
On Monday 14 January 2002 18:40, you wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> > >
> > > I am converting to become a Jew and it is very common for Jews not to
> >
> > spell
> >
> > > out the names of pagan gods. And NO I do not believe that jes-s is the
> > > messiah.
>
> So,
On Monday 14 January 2002 18:21, you wrote:
> > On Monday 14 January 2002 06:49, you wrote:
> > > On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> > > >>> Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
> > >
> > > Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent fashion of a Messianic Jew
> > > but apparen
On Monday 14 January 2002 21:02, chris wrote:
> On Monday 14 January 2002 06:49, you wrote:
>> On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
>> Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent fashion of a Messianic Jew but
>> apparently not convinced
> > > On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> >
> > I am converting to become a Jew and it is very common for Jews not to
> spell
> > out the names of pagan gods. And NO I do not believe that jes-s is the
> > messiah.
So, you are saying that Jesus is a God? And because Jewish and Christi
> On Monday 14 January 2002 06:49, you wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> > >>> Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
> >
> > Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent fashion of a Messianic Jew but
> > apparently not convinced that Messiah is Messiah, as foretold
On Monday 14 January 2002 06:49, you wrote:
> On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
> >>> Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
>
> Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent fashion of a Messianic Jew but
> apparently not convinced that Messiah is Messiah, as foretold. Please
> exp
On Sunday 13 January 2002 10:00, chris wrote:
>>> Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
Odd. Hyphenating jes-s after the reverent fashion of a Messianic Jew but
apparently not convinced that Messiah is Messiah, as foretold. Please explain?
> As this is the sword-devel list I do not wish
On Sunday 13 January 2002 01:39, Chris Little wrote:
> We also call the books of the Pentateuch 1-5 Moses respectively in many
> of our localized book names. Does anybody seriously believe that the
> Pentateuch was written by Moses and is not an amalgam of four major
> sources?
The JEDP hypothes
> >My point is that scholarship challenges many traditional notions of
> >Biblical authorship. At one point, Pauline authorship of
> Hebrews was
> >the prevailing view.
> >
> And prior to it becoming a prevailing view, it was not the
> prevailing view.
>
> >Modern Bibles don't typically gro
On Saturday 12 January 2002 20:00, you wrote:
> On Saturday 12 January 2002 20:14, you wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:51 AM
> >
On Saturday 12 January 2002 20:14, you wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Paul's epistles
>
> > On Saturday 1
- Original Message -
From: "chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Paul's epistles
> On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:39, you wrote:
> > > I see that the def
On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:39, you wrote:
> > I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles"
> > includes Hebrews. Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews
> > is by Paul?
>
> We also call the books of the Pentateuch 1-5 Moses respectively in many
> of our localized book names.
A lot of us old folks do!
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 03:34, Chris wrote:
>
> I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles" includes Hebrews.
> Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews is by Paul?
>
>
>
--
Terry
Rev 1:5
"...Unto him that loved us, and washed
us from our sins in
Chris Little wrote:
>>I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles"
>>includes Hebrews. Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews
>>is by Paul?
>>
>
>We also call the books of the Pentateuch 1-5 Moses respectively in many
>of our localized book names. Does anybody seriously beli
> > I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles"
> > includes Hebrews. Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews
> > is by Paul?
Traditionally, those letters with Paul as sender in the text are considered
Paul's letters. That would be Romans - Philemon. That is how we handle our
> I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles"
> includes Hebrews. Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews
> is by Paul?
We also call the books of the Pentateuch 1-5 Moses respectively in many
of our localized book names. Does anybody seriously believe that the
Pentateuch was
>
>
>The answer would be in where our average user expected Hebrews to be,and I would
>estimate that under "Paul's Epistles" was not a bad answer,
>
>even if technically incorrect, people would guess where to go.
>
Hmm, when searching (that's the only purpose of the categories isn't
it?), I was
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 08:34, Chris wrote:
>
> I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles" includes Hebrews.
> Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews is by Paul?
At the risk of getting off topic, I think there is an empirical "yes" to
your question - some people do seriously b
25 matches
Mail list logo
