Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-11 Thread dtrotzjr
ROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available > Looks like it's very buggy, though which of these are particular to me > and which are real bugs I can't say having only tested on one machi

RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-11 Thread Chris Little
2001 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available > > Ok, Call me stupid but how can I obtain a Chineese font (or other fonts > for > unicode modules for that matter) to test these with? Also which modules > should I download

RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-11 Thread Chris Little
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-sword- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Troy A. Griffitts > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 1:22 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available > > Well, I h

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-14 Thread David Trotz \(Integrity Online\)
I have noticed that in the latest Beta that the Chineese(UTF8) and Greek (LXXM) fonts work on two boxes at my office. At home however I cannot get the Chineese to show up at all, but the Greek does. Both machines are Windows NT with Internet Explorer 5.5 and w/ the additional Chineese fonts instal

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-15 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
OK, new InstallMgr.exe binary available. I switched over to the Jedi-Indy project FTP component. It's included in Kylix also and we were havin' troubles with the current FTP component anyway. So, tell me if ya have any troubles with remote installs, please: http://www.crosswire.org/sword/ALPHA

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-15 Thread dtrotzjr
> OK, new InstallMgr.exe binary available. I switched over to the > Jedi-Indy project FTP component. It's included in Kylix also and we > were havin' troubles with the current FTP component anyway. So, tell me > if ya have any troubles with remote installs, please: Nice to hear we are trying a

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-15 Thread Stephen Denne
> > OK, new InstallMgr.exe binary available. I switched over to the > > Jedi-Indy project FTP component. It's included in Kylix also and we > > were havin' troubles with the current FTP component anyway. So, tell me > > if ya have any troubles with remote installs, please: > > Nice to hear we a

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Thanks, everyone, for all the bug reports! Got 2 new binaries ready: http://www.crosswire.org/sword/ALPHAcckswwlkrfre22034820285912/alpha/sword.exe http://www.crosswire.org/sword/ALPHAcckswwlkrfre22034820285912/alpha/InstallMgr.exe Hope we got all the bugs you all mentioned. -Troy.

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-18 Thread dtrotzjr
as to be highlighted. And LXXM still shows garbage in the new testament. In Christ, David - Original Message - From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 2:27 PM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary ava

RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-18 Thread Chris Little
I'll try to fix by this evening. --Chris > - Original Message - > From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 2:27 PM > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available > >

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-18 Thread Stephen Denne
InstallMgr When I Refresh from Remote Source, it now says downloading 35040 of 0 (3504100%) All files for "Murdock" were downloaded and installed perfectly. For FinPR, The letter after "Phy" in the modules description "1938 PhyZ Raamattu" appears as a black block. Sword Windows Frontend "Hide

RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-18 Thread Chris Little
> For FinPR, The letter after "Phy" in the modules description > "1938 PhyZ Raamattu" appears as a black block. I think that's a Z with a breve, a high ascii character that has a tendency to cause problems. But hey, that's the module name, what can we do? > I think that InstallMgr should remo

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-19 Thread Stephen Denne
> > For FinPR, The letter after "Phy" in the modules description > > "1938 PhyZ Raamattu" appears as a black block. > > I think that's a Z with a breve, a high ascii character that has a > tendency to cause problems. But hey, that's the module name, what can > we do? Just noticed it, so thought

Re: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-19 Thread dtrotzjr
> I discovered later this afternoon that removing the module's corresponding line from the [TextView] section of layout.conf solves > the problem. > > So my ideas now are that installing or updating a module could set the line in that file to "true", removing a module could remove > the line from

RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-19 Thread Chris Little
> > > For FinPR, The letter after "Phy" in the modules > description "1938 > > > PhyZ Raamattu" appears as a black block. > > > > I think that's a Z with a breve, a high ascii character that has a > > tendency to cause problems. But hey, that's the module > name, what can > > we do? > > Ju

was: RE: [sword-devel] beta 1.5.2 WIN32 binary available

2001-06-15 Thread Chris Little
> Can anyone tell me what could be > different. How does it find the correct Unicode font without choosing it > explicitly? I'll take a stab at this, but I'm mostly guessing. I think when you install language packs, Windows "learns" how to handle those languages. So, where the Chinese works, you