I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
hope is to do this and still allow others to turn features on (if they
have the support) for a richer user interface.
I don't believe further comment on t
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 8:35 PM
Subject: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
> I appreciate the comments on standards. It's clear that we need to do
> our best to accommodate as many languages and browsers as we can. My
>
> Troy,
>
> I do not want to be a trouble maker, but was that a "yes" or a "no" to using
> valid markup (X)HTML according to W3c web standards? If yes, what DOCTYPE?
> The only reason I ask is for consistency in development. May I suggest
> structural XHTML 1.0 Transitional. As the New York Public
http://www.nypl.org/styleguide/index.html
If "no" its going to be awfully hard to collaborate effectively.
by grace alone,
Don A. Elbourne Jr.
http://elbourne.org
- Original Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday,
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Don,
> That sounds reasonable. I'm really looking forward to your ideas. You
> did such a good job with improving the look of the old sword website,
> it's hard to remember how bad the old one used to be!
>
> -Troy.
Let me remind yo
ot;Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: Standards (was: Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface)
> Don,
> That sounds reasonable. I'm really looking forward to your ideas. You
> did such a good j
