Matthias N. wrote:
> On 16 Jul., 18:49, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> project.com> wrote:
>> As with any Open-Source software, there is no definitive deadline for
>> symfony 1.1 but I will try hard to have a first beta by the end of August.
>>
>> I think we need to bundle a default ORM w
Hi guys,
I was browsing Trac tickets to check whether there's some issue I
already have addressed and I found
http://trac.symfony-project.com/trac/ticket/1886
I found some issues dealing with i18n (see
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs/t/296364f265edbf59) and
one of this was exactly wh
Just a note, Doctrine requires 5.2.3. At first, it was thought 5.2.2 was not
affected by the segfaults, but I have done some tests and 5.2.3 is the only
version where I did not experience any crashes.
- Jon
On 7/16/07, Matthias N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Jul., 18:49, Fabien POTENCIE
On 16 Jul., 18:49, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
project.com> wrote:
> As with any Open-Source software, there is no definitive deadline for
> symfony 1.1 but I will try hard to have a first beta by the end of August.
>
> I think we need to bundle a default ORM with symfony. I don't want to
As with any Open-Source software, there is no definitive deadline for
symfony 1.1 but I will try hard to have a first beta by the end of August.
I think we need to bundle a default ORM with symfony. I don't want to
force user to install a plugin as a first step to begin for every new
project.
I didn't mean to imply that i hoped/expected doctrine to be released
with symfony 1.1, unless symfony 1.1 was, say, 4 months away! lsmith's
characterization of doctrine is pretty accurate.
i've never heard any sort of timeframe for sf 1.1. it seems that UJS/PJS
are still alpha, and i havent seen
On 16 Jul., 09:52, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabien POTENCIER wrote:
> > As far as Doctrine is concerned, we won't be able to package it with
> > symfony 1.1 because:
>
> > - It requires php 5.2
> > - It is under major refactoring as of now
>
> I think symfony 1.1 should do PH
Hi,
I get errors trying to browse on the symfony trac.
Maybe any server problems?
Regards,
Matthias
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to
On 16 Jul., 15:19, weppos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great!
>
> Fabien, please forgive me if you already wrote that: is this commit
> part of Symfony 1.0.x branch or 1.1?
This is only with 1.1 (trunk).
Regards,
Matthias
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Great!
Fabien, please forgive me if you already wrote that: is this commit
part of Symfony 1.0.x branch or 1.1?
-- Simone
On Jul 16, 2:30 pm, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
project.com> wrote:
> As of r4550 (http://trac.symfony-project.com/trac/changeset/4550), the
> VERSION file was remo
As of r4550 (http://trac.symfony-project.com/trac/changeset/4550), the
VERSION file was removed and replaced by sfCore::VERSION constant.
Fabien
weppos wrote:
> Yesterday I came across the need to get Symfony version.
> I searched forums and groups but it seems the only way to get Symfony
> ver
Yesterday I came across the need to get Symfony version.
I searched forums and groups but it seems the only way to get Symfony
version is to read VERSION file
Symfony itself uses this function to check correspondence between
cache and library.
I would suggest to provide a convenient method for
Please ask your question on the user mailing-list as this list is only
for symfony development discussion.
Thanks,
Fabien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi my question is simple
>
> How can I add project into Zend-Studio after creating a new project.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> >
>
>
--~--~-~
It's really simple.
1. create a new symfony project
2. create a new project in Zend_Studio and add symfony project root to
Zend_Studio project paths
3. add your symfony library root, for example /opt/local/lib/php/
symfony, to Zend_Studio project paths
-- Simone
On Jul 16, 1:59 pm, "[EMAIL PROT
Thanks Fabien for your answer.
I will let you know if I find a reasonable solution.
Simone
On Jul 16, 9:49 am, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
project.com> wrote:
> i18n messages are loaded for the current module and the current
> application. So, it's a feature BUT in your case, it's a bit
Hi my question is simple
How can I add project into Zend-Studio after creating a new project.
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email t
On 16 Jul., 13:25, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matthias N. wrote:
> > To conclude: we can solve the problem with existing features of
> > symfony. We only need some adjustments mostly with sfController and
> > the filters config handler to distinguish request and action filters.
Matthias N. wrote:
> To conclude: we can solve the problem with existing features of
> symfony. We only need some adjustments mostly with sfController and
> the filters config handler to distinguish request and action filters.
One thing should also be looked into, and that all object instance
c
On 16 Jul., 09:54, Lukas Kahwe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fabien POTENCIER wrote:
> > I think we need some real benchmarks to know exactly what are the
> > slowest part of a typical request.
>
> > The last time I did this, I found the slowest part is the inclusion of
> > all the symfony co
sfFileValidator example in chapter 10 only validates mime-types, or
atleast so it appears. Not validating the actual extension would
normally allow third parties to have control over your php server by
inserting php in the image code.
Maybe the symfony routing system prevents this from happening,
Fabien POTENCIER wrote:
> I think we need some real benchmarks to know exactly what are the
> slowest part of a typical request.
>
> The last time I did this, I found the slowest part is the inclusion of
> all the symfony core libraries.
Thats beside the point. The question is if we can make i
Fabien POTENCIER wrote:
> As far as Doctrine is concerned, we won't be able to package it with
> symfony 1.1 because:
>
> - It requires php 5.2
> - It is under major refactoring as of now
I think symfony 1.1 should do PHP 5.1. symfony 1.2 should consider 5.2.
BTW: The goal is to have a stable
I think we need some real benchmarks to know exactly what are the
slowest part of a typical request.
The last time I did this, I found the slowest part is the inclusion of
all the symfony core libraries.
Tamcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I find the action stack useful when implementing menu. Sometime
i18n messages are loaded for the current module and the current
application. So, it's a feature BUT in your case, it's a bit counter
intuitive. I don't know how we can fix your problem.
Fabien
weppos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found a strange behavior.
> I don't really know if you can consider it
Because php 5.2 is not really well supported (yet) by web hosts.
As far as Doctrine is concerned, we won't be able to package it with
symfony 1.1 because:
- It requires php 5.2
- It is under major refactoring as of now
Fabien
eric williams wrote:
> Fabien, why not drop 5.0 AND 5.1 support?
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
