Hi,
Just wanted to know (before I open a ticket on github), if there was a
reason, why when I run a process using the process component, the component
takes over the timeout handling himself?
The problem is, that 'wait()' either never returns, or throws an exception,
but doesn't allow to silently
On Mar 7, 2013, at 22:05 , Beau Simensen wrote:
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:15:37 AM UTC-6, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> @Beau: that's common practice for users who want to stay bleeding edge. It
> basically requires 2.3-dev and still lets other required packages "see" it as
> 2.2 (compatible).
>
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:15:37 AM UTC-6, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> @Beau: that's common practice for users who want to stay bleeding edge. It
> basically requires 2.3-dev and still lets other required packages "see" it
> as 2.2 (compatible).
>
I see. I maybe saw someone talk mention this once
On 7 Mar 2013, at 19:13, Beau Simensen wrote:
> On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:05:17 AM UTC-6, Matt Robinson wrote:
> Finally, just out of curiosity, what's the benefit of using HttpKernel to
> make a static site generator. Wouldn't you just need Pimple, Finder, Twig,
> and Markdown (and maybe Ass
On Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:05:17 AM UTC-6, Matt Robinson wrote:
> Finally, just out of curiosity, what's the benefit of using HttpKernel to
> make a static site generator. Wouldn't you just need Pimple, Finder, Twig,
> and Markdown (and maybe Assetic and Imagine if you want to be fancy with
>
Static site generator in PHP with Symfony components?
Seems to exist: http://www.phrozn.info/en
-- Daniel
--
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on Symfony, please read the
procedure on http://symfony.com/security
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Mar 7, 2013, at 9:15 , Marco Pivetta wrote:
> @Beau: that's common practice for users who want to stay bleeding edge. It
> basically requires 2.3-dev and still lets other required packages "see" it as
> 2.2 (compatible).
right .. this is only relevant when you want to use non stable packag
On 7 Mar 2013, at 05:29, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On 03/06/2013 10:51 PM, Beau Simensen wrote:
>> My vision is to have a site like http://experience.symfony.com were all of
>> this is collected. It would be maintained on github.com as a static site.
>>
>> My static site generator is built around
On Mar 7, 2013, at 5:51 , Beau Simensen wrote:
> I'll have a handful of other Symfony backed projects I plan to release in the
> near future. This could be a great way to get a lot of exposure for cool new
> projects. It could get messy really fast. What I find to be a "cool Symfony
> project
@Beau: that's common practice for users who want to stay bleeding edge. It
basically requires 2.3-dev and still lets other required packages "see" it
as 2.2 (compatible).
This is root-package only, not something that is propagated as far as I
know: perfectly safe to hack around with dev-master :)
10 matches
Mail list logo