The UPGRADE file is the best place to look fro this kind of information.
2008/10/19 James [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
found it digging through the blog, would be nice to have it as a link on the
page for v1.1 so you don't have to search for it.
James
On Oct 18, 2008, at 10:19 PM, James wrote:
Is
I am excited by Symfony 1.2's development and is quite eager to try
out using the new functions in it.
I have the SVN versioned installed and along it is sfGuardplugin 3.0.
However I noted that when building models and trying to access the
sfGuardplugin's modules, it does not seem to know where
Hi,
I'm under the understanding that:
- users can belong to many groups.
- users can have many permissions.
- groups can have many permissions.
- users within groups have permissions associated to that group.
Example:
User
Group
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Flancer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I noted that when building models and trying to access the
sfGuardplugin's modules, it does not seem to know where they are.
As of 1.2, you must enable the plugin in your project configuration
class by hand:
I can't believe that any sfPlugin isn't going to be as full-featured
as one of the stand alone forum packages out there, but perhaps it
depends on how big your audience is going to be. My site after a year
has more than 1 million posts and around 125k registered users. So,
I'm glad we went with
Ok Thanks. That fixed my day :)
On Oct 19, 10:06 pm, Nicolas Perriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Flancer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I noted that when building models and trying to access the
sfGuardplugin's modules, it does not seem to know where they
I think you need to use $sf_user-getAllPermssions() to include a
users group permissions.
I usually overload the sfGuardUser::getPermissions function to use
getAllPermissions, it just makes more sense to me that way.
On 19 Oct 2008, at 13:04, Alex 'noetix' Joyce wrote:
After looking at
I'm sure using Doctrine natively or Propel natively has many
advantages in terms of performance optimizations etc over DbFinder.
BUT, it means maintaining 2 sets of code for the same plugin. A plugin
using DbFinder possibly wouldn't perform as well, but it would be only
1 set of code to
Anyone? :)
On Oct 9, 1:21 pm, Sumedh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No...we are directly connecting to a local server...no tunneling
etc...
We have configured a port for every developer in Apache...
The getHost() returns the host with correct port...
Also, thegetRelativeUrlRoot() method
