[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Alexandru-Emil Lupu wrote: > I dunno it was discussed before, but... could someone gimme some > comparaisons between propel and Doctrine? We are facing at this point a > critical point of a new application. Whatever work with propel or Doctrine. Doctrine will be the default O

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

I think you should learn doctrine, because propel is no more developed.. On 4 Nov, 10:39, Alexandru-Emil Lupu wrote: > HI! > I dunno it was discussed before, but... could someone gimme some > comparaisons between propel and Doctrine? We are facing at this point a > critical point of a new applic

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

cosmo, you're wrong. Propel is much alive. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:39 PM, cosmy wrote: > > I think you should learn doctrine, because propel is no more > developed.. > > On 4 Nov, 10:39, Alexandru-Emil Lupu wrote: > > HI! > > I dunno it was discussed befo

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

Thanks ... I already know Propel from my previous projects, but now i have started a huge project using doctrine ... It just seems more complete than Propel ... Alecs On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alan Bem wrote: > cosmo, you're wrong. Propel is much > alive.

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

Ah sorry, I was sure it wasn't supported anymore.. On 4 Nov, 14:12, Alan Bem wrote: > cosmo, you're wrong. Propel is much > alive. > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

@Alecs, glad you raise that question, as I'm in the same position. So far I've worked with Propel, and there was nothing I couldn't do with it. To me it seem the "slow development" perception stems from the fact that it was pretty mature already. @Eno, yeah that's the usual answer, but it offer

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Richtermeister wrote: > @Eno, > > yeah that's the usual answer, but it offers little explanation as to > *why*. Couple of reasons: You remember the survey on uservoice.com? Making Doctrine the default was a very popular suggestion. Another reason: Jonathan Wage works on D

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

On 04.11.2009, at 19:56, Eno wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Richtermeister wrote: > >> @Eno, >> >> yeah that's the usual answer, but it offers little explanation as to >> *why*. > > Couple of reasons: > > You remember the survey on uservoice.com? Making Doctrine the > default was > a very popu

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

I use both of them in 2 projects and Doctrine it's my choice. It's from the same company than Symfony (Sensio), the documentation is very very good, it's very easy to use (more friendly than Propel). Also, Zend Framework is going to adopt Doctrine, how gives you an impression of how a good ORM it

[symfony-users] Re: Propel 1.3 Vs Doctrine 1.2

I have Chose to work with Doctrine for several motives: 1) migrations support - on a big project with possible millions of records i think the ability to add / remove columns from database would be a small downtime ... as the migrations would do the job pretty well * propel is able do that by inst