Re: [symfony-users] Re: Question about Symfony 2.0

2010-02-23 Thread Gareth McCumskey
> End of support does not mean end of life. And keep in mind that for > urgend security issues we will backport patches even to unsupported > versions. So we will keep you covered in case of critical bugs. Now THAT is what we wanted to hear :D. As long as we are protected in the future from seriou

Re: [symfony-users] Re: Question about Symfony 2.0

2010-02-23 Thread Fabian Lange
Sounds Like Matthias is volunteering to prototype something like that :-) Do not worry about the work needed to upgrade. Look at this: If you started with symfony 1.0, then with just minor work you got a supported platform for 4 years With a bit more you got it for 6 years. And you can use symfony

[symfony-users] Re: Question about Symfony 2.0

2010-02-23 Thread Matthias N.
On 22 Feb., 13:47, Fabien Potencier wrote: > On 2/22/10 11:53 AM, Gareth McCumskey wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > I just finished watching the presentation by Fabien about Symfony 2.0, > > and it really looks great. You can see that the lessons learnt > > developing symfony 1.x have paid off for th

[symfony-users] Re: Question about Symfony 2.0

2010-02-23 Thread michael.pie...@googlemail.com
I hate to say it, because it means a lot of work for me too, but BC kills innovation. As Symfony 2 already introduce some new (core) concepts, it shouldn't change the course because of BC. I mean, it'll be a difficult migration from symfony 1 anyway. Oh, and i didn't mentioned Doctrine 2 :o) Mich