[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-10 Thread Nicolas CHARLOT
Le 10 sept. 08 à 10:24, Thomas Rabaix a écrit : > Hello, > > You can used your own caching mechanism with a filter. > > You may have a look to sfFunctionCache to store and retrieve your > breadcrumb. The only problem is to invalidate the cache breadcrumb > when the view change. Yes, I could use

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-10 Thread Thomas Rabaix
Hello, You can used your own caching mechanism with a filter. You may have a look to sfFunctionCache to store and retrieve your breadcrumb. The only problem is to invalidate the cache breadcrumb when the view change. Thomas On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Nicolas CHARLOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-09 Thread Nicolas CHARLOT
Le 10 sept. 08 à 04:52, Kris Wallsmith a écrit : > If you want to store a variable to the request scope in sf1.1, use the > request attribute holder: > > sfContext::getInstance()->getRequest()->setAttribute('foo', 'bar'); > > Is that what you're asking? No, I'm asking for a way to store one or m

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-09 Thread Kris Wallsmith
If you want to store a variable to the request scope in sf1.1, use the request attribute holder: sfContext::getInstance()->getRequest()->setAttribute('foo', 'bar'); Is that what you're asking? Kris On Sep 9, 2008, at 8:27 AM, Nicolas CHARLOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Le 9 sept. 08 à 16

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-09 Thread Nicolas CHARLOT
Le 9 sept. 08 à 16:48, CaffeineInc a écrit : > it does support parameterHolder.. but the way you access it is > different as context is now a singleton. > > sfContext::getInstance->getRequest()->getParameterHolder(); > > will work the same way. > or $this->getRequest()->getParamterHolder() from y

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-09 Thread CaffeineInc
it does support parameterHolder.. but the way you access it is different as context is now a singleton. sfContext::getInstance->getRequest()->getParameterHolder(); will work the same way. or $this->getRequest()->getParamterHolder() from your action. On Aug 19, 6:58 pm, Nicolas CHARLOT <[EMAIL

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-09-09 Thread Florian
Hello, Have you found a way to make this work ? I maybe have a solution : replace with getRequest()->getParameterHolder()- >has('isicsBreadcrumbs')) On 20 août, 01:35, Dustin Whittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nicolas, > > I have run into the same issue and my solution was to extend the vie

[symfony-users] Re: sf 1.1 : where has passed sfResponse parameter holder ?

2008-08-19 Thread Dustin Whittle
Nicolas, I have run into the same issue and my solution was to extend the view class and add the data as part of the response content. Also, you can define a contextual slot (with a cache_key tied to the uri. (which will get cached). Otherwise, you might be able to store as a user attribute. - D