[symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-21 Thread Jonathan Wage
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Rabaix wrote: > Hello, > > I just read and check out the sympal plugin on a existing symfony project. > (Fixtures failed to load : Invalid row key specified: EntityType_Page ). > I believe this is a bug in the symfony version you are using. I fixed a bug i

[symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-21 Thread Jonathan Wage
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Jonathan Wage wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Rabaix wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I just read and check out the sympal plugin on a existing symfony project. >> (Fixtures failed to load : Invalid row key specified: EntityType_Page ). >> > > I bel

[symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Pierre
On 21 Mrz., 18:00, Jonathan Wage wrote: > I also just fixed something in sfSympalPlugin that might have been the cause > of this. Can you try now? The EntityType_Page error is gone, but if I want to use the /login route, following errors occur: > Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in > /Users/pierre/

[symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Jonathan Wage
Hmm. I am not getting this currently. As I am developing on this actively right now, is it possible you got a checked out version during a time when I had introduced new bugs? I have been refactoring and enhancing a lot over this weekend. Can you try updating and trying the sympal:install command

Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Loïc Vernet
Is a Propel version planned for this plugin ? It would be great. May be i could help later. See you. COil --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony users" group. To post to this group, send

Re: Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Jonathan Wage
I don't think so. I'd welcome someone to fork it and maintain their own propel version. But I have know plans for Propel support in the main sfSympalPlugin. - Jon On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Loïc Vernet wrote: > Is a Propel version planned for this plugin ? > > It would be great. May be i

Re : Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Loïc Vernet
Hi Jon, You think it needs to be a different plugin ? Can't we have a Propel branch ? De : Jonathan Wage À : symfony-users@googlegroups.com Envoyé le : Dimanche, 22 Mars 2009, 19h36mn 55s Objet : Re: Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions I don&#x

Re: Re : Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions

2009-03-22 Thread Jonathan Wage
com > *Envoyé le :* Dimanche, 22 Mars 2009, 19h36mn 55s > *Objet :* Re: Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions > > I don't think so. I'd welcome someone to fork it and maintain their own > propel version. But I have know plans for Propel support in the main > sfSympa