On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Rabaix wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just read and check out the sympal plugin on a existing symfony project.
> (Fixtures failed to load : Invalid row key specified: EntityType_Page ).
>
I believe this is a bug in the symfony version you are using. I fixed a bug
i
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Jonathan Wage wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Rabaix wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I just read and check out the sympal plugin on a existing symfony project.
>> (Fixtures failed to load : Invalid row key specified: EntityType_Page ).
>>
>
> I bel
On 21 Mrz., 18:00, Jonathan Wage wrote:
> I also just fixed something in sfSympalPlugin that might have been the cause
> of this. Can you try now?
The EntityType_Page error is gone, but if I want to use the /login
route, following errors occur:
> Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in
> /Users/pierre/
Hmm. I am not getting this currently. As I am developing on this actively
right now, is it possible you got a checked out version during a time when I
had introduced new bugs? I have been refactoring and enhancing a lot over
this weekend.
Can you try updating and trying the sympal:install command
Is a Propel version planned for this plugin ?
It would be great. May be i could help later.
See you. COil
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send
I don't think so. I'd welcome someone to fork it and maintain their own
propel version. But I have know plans for Propel support in the main
sfSympalPlugin.
- Jon
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Loïc Vernet wrote:
> Is a Propel version planned for this plugin ?
>
> It would be great. May be i
Hi Jon,
You think it needs to be a different plugin ? Can't we have a Propel branch ?
De : Jonathan Wage
À : symfony-users@googlegroups.com
Envoyé le : Dimanche, 22 Mars 2009, 19h36mn 55s
Objet : Re: Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions
I don
com
> *Envoyé le :* Dimanche, 22 Mars 2009, 19h36mn 55s
> *Objet :* Re: Re : [symfony-users] Re: sfSympal Questions
>
> I don't think so. I'd welcome someone to fork it and maintain their own
> propel version. But I have know plans for Propel support in the main
> sfSympa