Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Rizgar Mella
Thank you kindly, I think this time I will be far more cautious. On Mar 26, 12:26 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Rizgar Mella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >  Those notes are actually really nice, far more elegent than the way > >  mine were set

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 1:20 AM, Rizgar Mella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those notes are actually really nice, far more elegent than the way > mine were set up. I jumped the gun in my excitement and submitted an > application i was thinking of withdrawing it to submit a more clear > and de

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Rizgar Mella
Those notes are actually really nice, far more elegent than the way mine were set up. I jumped the gun in my excitement and submitted an application i was thinking of withdrawing it to submit a more clear and detailed one (same topic though). I may take you up on that proof reading offer. Thanks O

how to apply with GSoC

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, so Google is now accepting applications. If you think you polished everything: * apply it to the Python Software Foundation (PSF) and the Portland State University (PSU). * put SymPy: as the first word in the title. That's because last year PSF got ~70 applications (SymPy had I think around

Re: Mathematical Knowledge

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi KizzoGirl! On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:45 AM, KizzoGirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello. > > To put a long story short (for now), I am a student interested in > doing something very useful this summer. When browsing the ideas of > many projects offered this summer for GSoC, SymPy caugh

Re: sympy on Windows: 1. broken from wx-PyShell 2. 100% CPU w/ plot

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Ryan James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 22:37 +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > So it's more of a luck, that things work in isympy, because isympy >

Re: duplicate code in sympy

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:30:26PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I noticed the Clone Digger (http://clonedigger.sourceforge.net/) on > > the GSoC Python list, so I tried it on sympy and failed. But

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Alan Bromborsky
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Mateusz Paprocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Unfortunately I don't have this book, so I don't know which methods >> > you mean. Could you please clarify? >> >> You can find it here: >> >> http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/ >> >>

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Mateusz Paprocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unfortunately I don't have this book, so I don't know which methods > > you mean. Could you please clarify? > > You can find it here: > > http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/ > > btw. I'm curious if heurisch() ca

Re: Abramowitz and Stegun - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Useful reference > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abramowitz_and_Stegun Wow, thanks I didn't know this book is available online. That's indeed very useful. Ondrej --~--~-~--~~~---~--~

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Mateusz Paprocki
> Unfortunately I don't have this book, so I don't know which methods > you mean. Could you please clarify? You can find it here: http://www.math.sfu.ca/~cbm/aands/ btw. I'm curious if heurisch() can handle elliptic integrals (with some minor modifications). Mateusz 2008/3/25, Alan Bromborsky

Abramowitz and Stegun - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2008-03-25 Thread Alan Bromborsky
Useful reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abramowitz_and_Stegun --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Pan Peng
Hi, all, I have finished my proposal for "Boolean Algebra module". Can I send my application to other organizations besides PSF? I remembered last year someone has proposed to three organizations:STScI, PSU, PSF. On Mar 25, 10:16 pm, "Mateusz Paprocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions > >> in sympy. Since ellip

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Alan Bromborsky
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions >> in sympy. Since elliptic integrals are not elementary function are you >> also planning to incorporate the capab

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ondrej Certik wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions > >> in sympy. Since ellip

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Alan Bromborsky
Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions >> in sympy. Since elliptic integrals are not elementary function are you >> also planning to incorporate the capab

Re: Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions > in sympy. Since elliptic integrals are not elementary function are you > also planning to incorporate the capability of identifying symbolic

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Mateusz Paprocki
> I guess I understand why you say "Tutorial", it isn't very clear, beside the > fact that's written in english makes me less at ease. anyway, this may be > difficult to understand and implement, but I have the whole summer (and > maybe some time before) By the term "Tutorial" I meant "Symbolic I

Reduction to elliptic integral form

2008-03-25 Thread Alan Bromborsky
I see you are trying to include the integration of elementary functions in sympy. Since elliptic integrals are not elementary function are you also planning to incorporate the capability of identifying symbolic integrals that will reduce to functions of elliptic integrals? --~--~-~--~

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Abderrahim Kitouni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:28:30 -0700 (PDT) > Mateusz Paprocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Implementing recursive Risch algorithm is a very important step to > > make SymPy's integrator robust, s

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Abderrahim Kitouni
Hi, On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Mateusz Paprocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Implementing recursive Risch algorithm is a very important step to > make SymPy's integrator robust, so I wish you or someone else will > try to implement it. Together with the heuristic algorithm and [1

Re: Ideas for GSoC2008

2008-03-25 Thread Mateusz Paprocki
Hi, for now we have following GSoC propositions: [1] [R. Mella] Integration in the Complex Plane [2] [A. Kitouni] Recursive Risch algorithm [3a] [P. Peng] Boolean Algebra module [3b] [P. Peng] Optimization module A few comments on this: > Now I come up with two new ideas: I will provide a "o