(sorry if you receive this twice, my email client got crazy)
But then Rational(1.) == Integer(1)
and that is not only ugly but incorrect ...
A solution would be to check if int(p) == p.
yeah, that would be a nice solution, but I think that accepting float's as
arguments is
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Fabian Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fabian Seoane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/10/21
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make Rational accept a wider range of types as
arguments.
To: sympy-patches@googlegroups.com
Good morning, I'm trying to do the following symbolic integration:
Integral(exp(v**2+3*v+2),v).doit() The real polynomial I'm trying to
integrate is a lot bigger... and the whole function has 3 more
integration parameters; but I do believe the polynomial is the
problem. How can I make this
Hi Pekeika!
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Pekeika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning, I'm trying to do the following symbolic integration:
Integral(exp(v**2+3*v+2),v).doit() The real polynomial I'm trying to
integrate is a lot bigger... and the whole function has 3 more
integration
2008/10/21 Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Pekeika!
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Pekeika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning, I'm trying to do the following symbolic integration:
Integral(exp(v**2+3*v+2),v).doit() The real polynomial I'm trying to
integrate is a lot bigger...
Hi,
I think it be cool to have this functionality. Here is some example
how it could look like:
http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/echeeve1/Ref/mna/MNA6.html
and here is some preliminary code:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1173
from Travis Vaught, SFO of Enthought. The
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:41 PM, henrik johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Thanks for the help. I dug a little deeper and found that the problem was
that both the LU and GaussElimination solver
could not detect zeros in the pivot elements. The problems disappeared if
the pivot
