Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1224 by Vinzent.Steinberg: some errors in limit function
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1224
I think the current behavior is fine. Or should Symbol('x') be complex by
default?
--
You received this message because you are
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Vinzent Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26 Nov., 15:59, Andy Ray Terrel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like it because it makes inconsistent '=' notation and I find
it easier to read with the whitespace. But I bow to the community on
it because it
From: Andy R. Terrel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
examples/advanced/pidigits.py | 37 -
examples/all.py |2 +-
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/advanced/pidigits.py b/examples/advanced/pidigits.py
index
Sage has problems with reviewing patches:
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html
I think our current patch review system could be improved too. So I
suggest to take part in the discussion.
Vinzent
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sage has problems with reviewing patches:
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html
I think our current patch review system could be improved too. So I
suggest to take part in the discussion.
On Dec 1, 12:07 pm, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sage has problems with reviewing patches:
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html
I think our current patch review system could be
We have also recently begun to do mostly-manditory code review for
IPython. We are a much smaller project than Sage of course, but it is
interesting that this (getting code reviews done promptly) is also a
problem for us as well. We will watch anxiously to see what the magic
solution is ;-)
