Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 18:37, Freddie Witherden
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hence I am currently interested in the opinions of others on the idea. I
>>> am aware that there was a GSoC proposal for it a year or so ago and am
>>>
Hi all,
On account of the overwhelming positive support for the idea I will think
that it is a worthwhile proposal for GSoC. However, is this a Sympy thing
(with Sympy being one of the main benefactors of the project) or a
matplotlib one (as the code does belong in matplotlib)?
Regards, Freddie
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Freddie Witherden
wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> On account of the overwhelming positive support for the idea I will think
> that it is a worthwhile proposal for GSoC. However, is this a Sympy thing
> (with Sympy being one of the main benefactors of the project) or a
>
Yesterday I ran into some trouble when trying to integrate a simple
integral that should return atan(x). I also found an open bug about
this topic: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=636&q=atan
.
So, I took a peek into sympy/simplify/simplify.py's trigsimp function.
So I tried to add
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Priit Laes wrote:
>
> Yesterday I ran into some trouble when trying to integrate a simple
> integral that should return atan(x). I also found an open bug about
> this topic: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=636&q=atan
> .
>
> So, I took a peek into
On Feb 26, 6:57 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Priit Laes wrote:
>
> > Yesterday I ran into some trouble when trying to integrate a simple
> > integral that should return atan(x). I also found an open bug about
> > this topic:http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/det
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Priit Laes wrote:
>
> On Feb 26, 6:57 pm, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Priit Laes wrote:
>>
>> > Yesterday I ran into some trouble when trying to integrate a simple
>> > integral that should return atan(x). I also found an open bug ab
Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is
quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class.
-- Jonathan
On Feb 25, 10:39 pm, Andrew Straw wrote:
> Jonathan Taylor wrote:
> > This is a request is for a subclass of Function that can be
> > given a c
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote:
>
> Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is
> quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class.
thanks for your request. I think it would be useful to have it. Do you
have some ideas
Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote:
>> Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is
>> quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class.
>
> thanks for your request. I think it would be useful to
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Andrew Straw wrote:
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi Jonathan,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:33 PM, jtaylor74 wrote:
>>> Yes, I think it's related and I have used the DeferredVector which is
>>> quite useful. I guess you could say I want a DeferredFunction class
11 matches
Mail list logo
