Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #3 on issue 1145 by ondrej.certik: sympy.test(): implement
doctesting without the py lib
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1145
Patch attached.
Attachments:
0001-.-setup.py-test_doc-now-runs-our-testsuite.patch 4.2 KB
--
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #27 on issue 1052 by ondrej.certik: 2.0 * x**2 should print more
nicely
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1052
Patch attached, please review.
Attachments:
0001-Printing-precision-fixed-all-over-sympy-1052.patch 11.6 KB
--
Comment #2 on issue 1343 by mattpap: Polynomial GCD examples seem to be
broken
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1343
The documentation concerning polynomials is in general outdated, which is
ashame of
me I haven't updated it for so long. Talking about this particular case,
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1267 by ondrej.certik: improve our str printer:
1/cos(x)*sin(x) - sin(x)/cos(x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1267
Thanks. The second patch fixes the doctests, but unfortunately it doesn't
pass the
regular tests... We
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Comment #1 on issue 1254 by ondrej.certik: let's call bin/doctest
from ./setup.py test
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1254
Patch sent to the issue 1145. Closing this.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-Medium -Milestone-Release0.6.4 Priority-High
Comment #8 on issue 1274 by ondrej.certik: trigsimp doesn't like decimals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1274
Thanks, this is in. However, the problem
trigsimp(cos(x)**2. + sin(x)**2.)
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #3 on issue 1347 by mattpap: creating lambda evaluator failed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1347
Seems to be pyglet + Windows problem. On Linux it works fine (see the
attached
screenshot). Any ideas guys? Maybe we should forward this
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 1348 by fab...@fseoane.net: python printer incorretly treats 1/2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1348
In [11]: print python(x**Rational(1,2))
x = Symbol('x')
e = x**(Half(1, 2))
Why Half(1,2) ?
Comment #6 on issue 1305 by mattpap: sympy.roots not working for slightly
more complicated polynomials
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1305
+1, there is need to check the exact result
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue,
Comment #8 on issue 1297 by andy.terrel: examples don't run
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1297
This will work for running the all script but not for running each
individual script.
If the goal is to just run the all script from the top directory without
sympy in
the
Comment #3 on issue 1342 by docherty: Calulating a series expansion hangs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1342
Glad to be of some help.
The name and email for the patch would be Andrew Docherty
andr...@maths.usyd.edu.au.
Thanks for looking at the project. I'm going to put the
Comment #4 on issue 1337 by Vinzent.Steinberg: find all instances in an
expression
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1337
I implemented find() using full pattern matching:
x = Symbol('x')
e = (log(tan(x**2)) - 1)/(tan(tan(x - 1)) + cos(tan(1)))
a = Wild('a')
print find(e,
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #1 on issue 1349 by mattpap: 'int' object has no attribute 'is_Add'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349
Thanks for reporting this.
It fails in an interactive session because you try to pretty print it. This
an
obvious bug in
Comment #2 on issue 1349 by david.huard: 'int' object has no
attribute 'is_Add'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349
Good to know. I'm just starting to learn sympy, so I wasn't sure if this
was a bug or
just me doing something wrong. I'll watch out and maybe try to attach a
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.6.5
Comment #3 on issue 1349 by ondrej.certik: 'int' object has no
attribute 'is_Add'
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1349
Thanks for the feedback. This is clearly a bug, that should be fixed. I
assigned it
to the next release.
nice patch. +1
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Fabian Seoane fab...@fseoane.net wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
sending a trivial patch to remove hacks from trigsimp.
removing hacks is always good news, but I do not agree that
sin(x)**2/cos(x)**2 is a valid answer.
Yes, I plan to do much of the work around the new assumptions system;
I'll probably keep a port of Fabian's assumptions system, until the
logic module is accepted. :)
On Mar 25, 8:42 am, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
Hi Akshay!
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Akshay Srinivasan
I know Robert and Fabian already gave it a shot (thanks!). Unless
someone figures it out, I think if you are all ok, let's just release
without speeding it up, as I think after all the issues above are
reviewed and patches in, it's more important to release.
Thanks Ondrej. Don't know how
I was teaching till 7pm, so I sit in my office and told myself that I
will not go home before I fix all the release issues. I finished at
1pm, so it was 6 hours.
I mean 1am of course.
O.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
19 matches
Mail list logo
