Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #18 on issue 1463 by Toon.Verstraelen: Initial codegen
implementation
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1463
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Comment #16 on issue 1490 by Toon.Verstraelen: LatexPrinter doprint
inline=None
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1490
All tests pass, also after a 'git rebase master'.
Could you update the tutorial with the attached patch? (For some reason the
documentation is no longer tested
Comment #9 on issue 1505 by Toon.Verstraelen: doc Makefile does not work
when sphinx is installed in $HOME
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1505
I've updated the docday branch on github. Troubling patches have been
removed and
applied git rebase master.
--
You received this
Updates:
Labels: -EasyToFix
Comment #27 on issue 1306 by fab...@fseoane.net: Test the rst docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1306
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0 Documentation
Comment #4 on issue 1521 by fab...@fseoane.net: doc/ doctests fail
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1521
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Comment #10 on issue 1491 by ryanlists: generalize mainvar in LatexPrinter
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1491
Yes, something definitely needs to be done to easily allow all printers to
ues the
same sorting functionality. A Printer super-class seems logical.
--
You received
Comment #17 on issue 1490 by ryanlists: LatexPrinter doprint inline=None
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1490
Thanks. Ondrej directed me to option 2 as well, so that is what we did.
For some
reason, I can't download that patch. Are you talking about the 10 or so
lines
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1541 by ceyhuneksin: Latex Print issue with printing min_, max_
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1541
When printing any equation that involves min_ or max_, the latex print is
as given in the example:
x =
Updates:
Owner: ---
Comment #28 on issue 1306 by fab...@fseoane.net: Test the rst docs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1306
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Printing
New issue 1542 by fab...@fseoane.net: Pretty printing for boolean operations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1542
Would be nice to print x y instead of the actual And(x, y). Same with
Or and |
--
You
Updates:
Owner: fab...@fseoane.net
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #21 on issue 398 by fab...@fseoane.net: An idea: assumption model
based on Interval
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=398
This is interesting. Assumptions based on intervals should be
So Ondrej and I were able to get this working. We now just need to
hook it into the regular testing. If any one wants to give this a
shot, the branch to pull from is http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/par2
. See t.py
Aaron Meurer
On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On
I have found that the quartics routine can return two sets of 4 roots
(that can be selected by exchanging the signs in A and B of the
routine). The present set returned is correct if there are 4 real
roots or if there are 2 real and all the coefficients are real. The
other set (according to the
Hi,
Could someone take a quick look at the tiny patches for issue 1533 and 1534.
They block for further work on fcode and ccode. Tests run fine when applied to
the master branch.
cheers,
Toon
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1533
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Toon
Verstraelentoon.verstrae...@ugent.be wrote:
Hi,
Could someone take a quick look at the tiny patches for issue 1533 and 1534.
They block for further work on fcode and ccode. Tests run fine when applied to
the master branch.
cheers,
Toon
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Fabian Pedregosafab...@fseoane.net wrote:
SymPy 0.6.5 has been finally released on July 17, 2009.
Great job. Time to open the beer.
Salud!
I re-enabled testing documentation under doc/
If someone could take a look into this
Hi,
I was just reading up on the GA module.
Reading through the wiki
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/Geometric_Algebra_Module
and this
http://docs.sympy.org/modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html
I stumbled on the use of set_main():
Isn't there a cleaner way of doing this -- it seems like quite some hack...
On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
Hi,
I was just reading up on the GA module.
Reading through the wiki
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/Geometric_Algebra_Module
and this
http://docs.sympy.org/modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html
I just noticed that in the docs for the GA
Tim Lahey wrote:
On Jul 17, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Sebastian Haase wrote:
Hi,
I was just reading up on the GA module.
Reading through the wiki
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/Geometric_Algebra_Module
and this
http://docs.sympy.org/modules/galgebra/GA/GAsympy.html
I just noticed that
On Jul 16, 6:48 pm, Toon Verstraelen toon.verstrae...@ugent.be
wrote:
Christophe wrote:
Hello,
suppose that we have the following expression :
(x**2+1)*(log(x+4)-7)
I would like to know that is a product and to have :
(x**2+1) and (log(x+4)-7).
In terms of
That's look great. Indeed, I'm looking for strategies to solve simple
inequations of one variable.
Best regards.
Christophe.
smichr a écrit :
On Jul 16, 6:48 pm, Toon Verstraelen toon.verstrae...@ugent.be
wrote:
Christophe wrote:
Hello,
suppose that we have the following
I think you should use the built in assumptions on the variables (such
as is_real, is_positive, and so on). You can return a symbol that has
a real assumption on it if you need that. Other than that, I would
use re() and im() to access the imaginary parts, and the sign()
function to
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Will this be easy_installable (as of now still shows 0.6.4 as current)
I'd love to! But I need some help, it doesn't work for some reason.
Here is what I got:
$ easy_install --prefix=~/usr sympy
Creating
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:50:17AM -0600, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Will this be easy_installable (as of now still shows 0.6.4 as current)
I'd love to! But I need some help, it doesn't work for some reason.
Here is what I
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Gael
Varoquauxgael.varoqu...@normalesup.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:50:17AM -0600, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Will this be easy_installable (as of now still shows 0.6.4 as current)
Any idea how long until this makes its way to fink?
Aaron Meurer
On Jul 16, 2009, at 4:33 PM, Fabian Pedregosa wrote:
SymPy 0.6.5 has been finally released on July 17, 2009.
Source distribution can be downloaded from
http://sympy.googlecode.com/files/sympy-0.6.5.tar.gz
Windows binaries
2 questions:
1) It is helpful to also install gmpy?
2) Can I test sympy from easy_installed sympy (without having a copy of sympy
source distr)?
ie: I can't follow these directions : To test the whole SymPy package, run
./setup.py test in the sympy directory which is found here:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
2 questions:
1) It is helpful to also install gmpy?
It speeds up some numerical things, but sympy works perfectly fine
without it as well.
2) Can I test sympy from easy_installed sympy (without having a copy of sympy
28 matches
Mail list logo
