Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 1521 by asmeurer: doc/ doctests fail
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1521
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #2 on issue 1641 by asmeurer: doctests require newline only when
run for single file
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1641
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are listed in
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Documentation
New issue 1641 by asmeurer: doctests require newline only when run for
single file
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1641
$./bin/doctest sympy/core/function.py
a bunch of errors relating to there
Status: Accepted
Owner: asmeurer
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1642 by asmeurer: decorators in functions/special/polynomials.py
prevent printing in Mul.flatten (and others)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1642
It seems that the @recurrence_memo decorators in
Comment #3 on issue 1641 by smichr: doctests require newline only when run
for single file
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1641
There are no errors reported running Python 2.6.2 or 2.4 on windows. All
tests report
as passing, so there is no newline error. If I try to run the
You might look at the new rewritten polys module on issue 1598. We
should hopefully have that merged in whenever Mateusz is fully
finished with it. Until then, you can pull his branch and check it out.
Aaron Meurer
On Sep 8, 2009, at 7:24 AM, William Purcell wrote:
I am trying to
list(_.iter_all_coeffs()) does what I want. I will still take a look at
Mateusz's work.
Thanks for the help guys.
Bill
smichr wrote:
If you use .iter_all_coeffs() I think you will get what you want:
###
Poly(x**2+1,x)
Poly(x**2 + 1, x)
list(_.iter_all_coeffs())
[1, 0, 1]
###
