[sympy] Re: Future plans for pattern matching

2010-05-08 Thread Vinzent Steinberg
On 7 Mai, 23:51, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Another possibility would be to somehow take advantage of *args, which is ordered. What about expand('mul', 'trig')? Vinzent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to this

[sympy] Re: Future plans for pattern matching

2010-05-08 Thread smichr
On May 8, 5:37 pm, Vinzent Steinberg vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 Mai, 23:51, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: Another possibility would be to somehow take advantage of *args, which is ordered. What about expand('mul', 'trig')? This works if you just want hints

Re: [sympy] Re: Future plans for pattern matching

2010-05-08 Thread Aaron S. Meurer
It could work if the hints are callable objects as Sebastian suggests, though you would have to first dig up the objects in order to call them. Aaron Meurer On May 8, 2010, at 7:43 AM, smichr wrote: On May 8, 5:37 pm, Vinzent Steinberg vinzent.steinb...@googlemail.com wrote: On 7 Mai,

[sympy] removing old assumptions branch

2010-05-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I started to remove the old assumptions (I simply deleted them) and then fixed couple things and tests in the core. It's in this branch: http://github.com/certik/sympy/tree/assum And the results of sympy.core tests so far: tests finished: 304 passed, 17 failed, 5 expected to fail, 1