Le samedi 24 juillet 2010 à 13:10 -0700, Brian Granger a écrit :
> I written tests for this now.
>
>
> Brian
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brian Granger
> wrote:
> Here is an addition patch that adds this capability to all
> binary special methods in Expr:
>
>
I written tests for this now.
Brian
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Here is an addition patch that adds this capability to all binary special
> methods in Expr:
>
>
> http://github.com/ellisonbg/sympy/commit/116acd6ef2bde6d0d0aa8c2f2ec1f380abbabab1
>
> The performance p
Here is an addition patch that adds this capability to all binary special
methods in Expr:
http://github.com/ellisonbg/sympy/commit/116acd6ef2bde6d0d0aa8c2f2ec1f380abbabab1
The performance penalty is still around 1%. If there is support for this
approach, I would like to merge it to trunk soon a
Here is a simple implementation that does a priority based check for __mul__
and __rmul__:
http://github.com/ellisonbg/sympy/commit/bb449fbdf78f5ef19351640d987d96204c6c3f34
On my machine the test suite does not slow down a significant amount (within
1%). Of course, if we use this approach on all
Alan,
This only works because you have custom scalars as well. Because of
this, you have overridden the __mul__ and __rmul__ methods of *every*
object that is used in GA. But in quantum mechanics, I still need to
use all the regular sympy scalars that use the default Expr.__mul__
and Expr,__rmul
Brian Granger wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote:
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 17:41 -0700, Brian Granger a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
First off, pragmatically speaking, is there a reason why you need to use the
core
