Re: [sympy] Tuple doesn't count

2011-09-01 Thread Tom Bachmann
I'm pretty sure you are aware of this, but count is actually a method of Expr. Not sure how to use it, though: In [3]: sin(2*x).count(S(2)) Out[3]: 0 In [6]: sin(2*x).count(x) Out[6]: 0 ... On 01.09.2011 06:07, smichr wrote: Is there a nice way to get Tuple to inherit tuple's methods? e.g. t

Re: [sympy] Tuple doesn't count

2011-09-01 Thread Chris Smith
I didn't look into it. I now see: >>> Tuple(1,2,3,4,2).count(lambda i:i==2) 2 It should probable work when receiving a simple count(2), however. I suspect it's because rec_find doesn't register {} (not None) as a hit. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sympy] Re: What should Matrix([1,2,3]) give?

2011-09-01 Thread smichr
OK, it looks like the instantiation is not going to change. Could someone interested in Matrix take a look at the other changes: All indices (except absolute indices) behave like indices to python lists. So negative indices are now supported: M[1,-1] gives the last element of row 1 col_insert(-1,

Re: [sympy] Tuple doesn't count

2011-09-01 Thread Mateusz Paprocki
Hi, On 1 September 2011 05:13, Chris Smith wrote: > I didn't look into it. I now see: > > >>> Tuple(1,2,3,4,2).count(lambda i:i==2) > 2 > > It should probable work when receiving a simple count(2), however. I > suspect it's because rec_find doesn't register {} (not None) as a hit. The issue is

[sympy] Re: Tuple doesn't count

2011-09-01 Thread smichr
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/585 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, vi

Re: [sympy] Re: Integral - PyQt GUI for SymPy to calculate integrals

2011-09-01 Thread Aaron Meurer
OK, they both seem to work on my computer now. Aaron Meurer On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote: > On 12 ago, 10:46, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> > Ah, I see.  The printing doesn't seem to work on my computer.  It just

Re: [sympy] Re: What should Matrix([1,2,3]) give?

2011-09-01 Thread Aaron Meurer
I didn't read any code, but here's my thoughts on what you said here On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 6:16 AM, smichr wrote: > OK, it looks like the instantiation is not going to change.  Could > someone interested in Matrix take a look at the other changes: > > All indices (except absolute indices) behave

[sympy] Re: ipytex cont.

2011-09-01 Thread Aaron Meurer
(forgot to CC the original author) Aaron Meurer On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hi. > > I am forwarding this message, and all attachments, that was sent to me > (with the author's permission).  I don't have time to look at this > now, so if others could play around with it,

Re: [sympy] Re: ipytex cont.

2011-09-01 Thread Brian Granger
Kurt, Specifically what changes did you have to make to Basic. IPython allows you to register arbitrary print logic for any class without changing that class, so all of this should be possible without any changes to Basic or the rest of sympy. Are you able to use the latex that is generated by s

Re: [sympy] Re: What should Matrix([1,2,3]) give?

2011-09-01 Thread Chris Smith
>> The dot product is a little more flexible, returning a list if given >> anything other than a single row or col > > I don't know if that's a great idea.  You can just do matrix > multiplication if you want multiple dot products (and it may even be > faster). It always does matrix multiplication