Comment #5 on issue 2684 by alvin.sa...@gmail.com: Deepcopy does not work
on evaluate False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2684
I'm using Sympy in a project where this issue came up - that is, pickle was
not able to handle Sympy Functions which were constructed using a
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 2609 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: core/test_priority error
under Python 3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2609
This was fixed by Mateusz in pull request #633.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #3 on issue 2672 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: UnificationFailed with
integrate(-diff(y/(x**2 + y**2), y), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2672
Something changed in the mean time, I now get this:
In [1]: x, y = symbols('x y', real=True)
In [2]:
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #1 on issue 2702 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: rank_trotterjohnson
gives wrong results
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2702
The pull request is now in, so I'm guessing this is fixed. I've no idea
what rank_trotterjohnson is and you didn't
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2690 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: hyper and meijerg pretty
printer should use pretty_symbology
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2690
Pull request is now in, so I guess this if Fixed.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 1954 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: sympy-libmp
incompatibility in Fedora
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1954
I'm gonna go ahead and close this. SymPy in Fedora has been updated to
0.6.7 (but not 0.7.1, of course) and this is
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #2 on issue 1876 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: SymbolsError:
integrate(1/x+x,x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1876
This worked then and it works now. Since the user didn't respond with any
additional information after all this time,
Comment #2 on issue 2702 by mario.pe...@gmail.com: rank_trotterjohnson
gives wrong results
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2702
The pull request is now in, so I'm guessing this is fixed.
Thanks.
you didn't provide the right results, so I'm not sure.
The right result for
Comment #6 on issue 2684 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: Deepcopy does not work
on evaluate False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2684
Thanks Alvin, there's also some current work to solve this at:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/622
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #2 on issue 2718 by asmeurer: integrate() fails with
UnificationFailed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2718
This was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Comment #7 on issue 2684 by patry.ni...@gmail.com: Deepcopy does not work
on evaluate False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2684
Yep, and it's working for me so far. It should also work on all objects
(not just functions or Mul)
--
You received this message because you
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2672 by asmeurer: UnificationFailed with
integrate(-diff(y/(x**2 + y**2), y), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2672
It was fixed by Mateusz's recent integration() fix:
commit 04a53dc970eb8632745fe0382c9864d0976231fa
Comment #5 on issue 2672 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: UnificationFailed with
integrate(-diff(y/(x**2 + y**2), y), x)
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2672
Nope, I'm cool. Didn't know there was another issue for it.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #3 on issue 1954 by matt...@gmail.com: sympy-libmp incompatibility
in Fedora
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1954
Starting with with SymPy 0.7.2 we should also publish
sympy-x.x.x-no-mpmath. Recently I saw that the same issue with mpmath being
included in SymPy
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 2684 by asmeurer: Deepcopy does not work on evaluate
False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2684
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Simplify
New issue 2719 by matt...@gmail.com: simplify() should take complexity
measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
Simplicity of expressions depends on the complexity measure taken, e.g.:
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 2719 by asmeurer: simplify() should take complexity
measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
I can't actually reproduce your output of simplify(g), though I agree that
this is a good idea. I've started
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 2719 by asmeurer: simplify() should take complexity
measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/636.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #3 on issue 2719 by matt...@gmail.com: simplify() should take
complexity measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
I can't actually reproduce your output of simplify(g)
I most likely used -A sort_key when experimenting with this.
--
You received this
Status: Accepted
Owner: matt...@gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High
New issue 2720 by matt...@gmail.com: Fix physics/mechanics to work under
Python 2.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2720
Tests fail with:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File bin/test, line 62,
Updates:
Labels: Physics
Comment #1 on issue 2720 by matt...@gmail.com: Fix physics/mechanics to
work under Python 2.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2720
setter was added in 2.6 (see http://bugs.python.org/issue1416).
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #29 on issue 1262 by matt...@gmail.com: fix sympy to work in
python3.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1262
@vlada.peric: can you update this and related issues? Both blocking issues
are still relevant but not related directly to Python 3 anymore.
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 2720 by matt...@gmail.com: Fix physics/mechanics to
work under Python 2.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2720
Pull request is here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/638
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #4 on issue 2690 by vlada.pe...@gmail.com: hyper and meijerg pretty
printer should use pretty_symbology
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2690
Pull request is now in, so I guess this if Fixed.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -NeedsReview PassedReview
Comment #2 on issue 2718 by asmeurer: integrate() fails with
UnificationFailed
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2718
This was merged.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #8 on issue 2684 by asmeurer: Deepcopy does not work on evaluate
False
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2684
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 2719 by asmeurer: simplify() should take complexity
measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/636.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #3 on issue 2719 by matt...@gmail.com: simplify() should take
complexity measure argument
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2719
I can't actually reproduce your output of simplify(g)
I most likely used -A sort_key when experimenting with this.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: Started
Labels: NeedsReview
Comment #2 on issue 2720 by matt...@gmail.com: Fix physics/mechanics to
work under Python 2.5
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2720
Pull request is here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/638
--
You received this
Mateuz,
Did might you push your patch to a git fork? Where did your local
patch go?
V/R
Scott
On Oct 6, 1:04 pm, Mateusz Paprocki matt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On 6 October 2011 11:57, Scott scotta_2...@yahoo.com wrote:
How do I coerce integrate(a/(a**2+b*a+b*c*x**2),x) to yield.
Actually, his patch was pushed up to a pull request, which has since
been merged (see https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/632). This
should now work in the official SymPy git master.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Scott scotta_2...@yahoo.com wrote:
Mateuz,
Did might you push
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Mateusz Paprocki matt...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I'm not in the core team, but I've been asked to write such a paper
on some CAS (eg, sympy) by Communications of the ACM, for the
Dec issue (due in Nov). I was thinking of doing so, if there is no
objection.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Hans Harhoff Andersen
hansharh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sympy.
I am trying to use circuit_plot to plot my quantum circuit. I can get
CNOT and such gates working, but I can't get the Toffoli/CCNOT gate to
plot. As I read the documentation I should be able to
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Hans Harhoff Andersen
hansharh...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that this is a bug since I can get it to work by writing:
gate.CGate((2,1),gate.X(0))
When I do
gate.CNOT((2,1),0)
I get:
TypeError: List indices must be integers, not Tuple
Yep you got it.
On
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Hans Harhoff Andersen
hansharh...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked that the problem persists even in newest git version.
I should mention that I don't consider this to be a bug as most people
use the word CNOT gate to mean the two qubit gate.
Also I have a
Hello
Thanks for your informative replies. I am kinda new to git but I will
try to figure out how to do pull requests (do I need to create a
separate fork in github that you can pull?)
We probably also need some sort of class to handle mixed control gates
ie. trigger on some qubits on and some
I've found the sympy github wiki page on Development Workflow to be
quite helpful in getting started with git and github
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Development-workflow
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Hans Harhoff Andersen
hansharh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
Thanks for your
Also, I or someone else can help you out on our IRC channel (if we're
around, of course), which is #sympy on freenode. Feel free to ask for
help there if you get stuck with the git stuff, or with SymPy
questions.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com
38 matches
Mail list logo
