Comment #2 on issue 2842 by waks...@gwax.com: evalf should not use
conjugate or expand if there are symbols; 1 should return as 1.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2842
It is worth noting that the current behavior contradicts the documentation:
From
Issue 2712: Merge gsoc-2 and gsoc-3
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2712
This issue is now blocking issue 2915.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2915
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2915 by ness...@gmail.com: Improve meijerint heuristics
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2915
The code to rewrite an arbitrary expression in terms of meijer
g-functions is very much heuristic; these
Comment #19 on issue 1616 by sgtmook...@gmail.com: Bug in subs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1616
I run the coverage_report.py on core.mul, and the _eval_subs function is
well covered. In addition, no coverage increase is found by the tests in
comment 10.
--
You received
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #20 on issue 1616 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Bug in subs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1616
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To post to this group, send email to
Comment #21 on issue 1616 by smi...@gmail.com: Bug in subs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1616
Thanks for checking this out, SgtMook. Did you undertake this as a GCI
exercise?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
Comment #2 on issue 2842 by waks...@gwax.com: evalf should not use
conjugate or expand if there are symbols; 1 should return as 1.0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2842
It is worth noting that the current behavior contradicts the documentation:
From
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote:
Am 13.12.2011 01:15, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
Hi.
Google has posted a wrap-up post for Google Summer of Code for SymPy
on their open source blog at
That's great. I'll start using it. Still, I have a few questions:
Is it a bad idea to run it like this: while ((1)); do ./sympy-bot all;
done; ? That way I can leave it and it will run forever. I have
.sympy-bot config file so it will not ask for password.
If two developers are running it at the
When does this happen (the crash)?
At the start of the docbuilding the only thing I get is:
stefan@stefan-tablet:~/Workspace/sympy/doc$ make html
rm -rf sphinx
mkdir -p src/.static
mkdir -p _build/html
mkdir -p _build/doctrees
mkdir -p src/modules
PYTHONPATH=..: sphinx-build -b html -d
I wonder if it's related to qsnake somehow. Does it do it if you run
it outside of that?
Aaron Meurer
Sent from my iPhone.
On Dec 12, 2011, at 10:27 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/1 Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:33 AM,
13.12.2011 09:27, Ondřej Čertík пишет:
2011/12/1 Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:33 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
From the readme in the doc directory:
apt-get install python-sphinx texlive-latex-recommended dvipng
make
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:04 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
That's great. I'll start using it. Still, I have a few questions:
Is it a bad idea to run it like this: while ((1)); do ./sympy-bot all;
done; ? That way I can leave it and it will run forever. I have
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Alexey U. Gudchenko pr...@goodok.ru wrote:
13.12.2011 09:27, Ondřej Čertík пишет:
2011/12/1 Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:33 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
From the readme in the doc
2011/12/13 Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.com
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:04 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
That's great. I'll start using it. Still, I have a few questions:
Is it a bad idea to run it like this: while ((1)); do ./sympy-bot all;
done; ?
Actually about transferring the logic to the webapp I'm saying that it's
complicated mainly because I don't know how to do it. Ondrej knows how to
work with it better than me so if he says that this is straightforward and
preferred solution I'll certainly agree.
Stefan
On 13 December 2011 19:23,
Am 13.12.2011 10:52, schrieb Ondřej Čertík:
Do you mean the Google Code-In translators?
Yep.
The above blog post is for the Summer of Code.
Ah. I missed that one.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to
I see. I would ask somewhere like the git mailing list or
stackoverflow about this. There's probably a way to either hide it in
the diff like you want, or to stage the non-conflicting parts so that
the conflicting parts are all that remain in the diff.
Aaron Meurer
2011/12/12 Ondřej Čertík
The only way to eliminate the kind duplication that you talked about
is to have the webapp serve requests. The rest could be distributed,
though I think that certain other things should also be centralized.
Ondrej, if you implement the webapp framework for this, I can help
with the client-side
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
The only way to eliminate the kind duplication that you talked about
is to have the webapp serve requests. The rest could be distributed,
though I think that certain other things should also be centralized.
Ondrej, if you
Actually my solution is to load the whole comment page and regex out the
hash. It's only two lines of code but I'm almost ashamed of them. That is
why I was saying all the time that the script is only a workaround. I'll
close the pr and open an issue about it. Isn't the hash already in some
21 matches
Mail list logo
