On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, smichr wrote:
>> Two questions:
>>
>> 1) Why do FockStateKet and FockStateBra print as FockState?
>>
> BKet((n,))
>> FockState((n,))
> BBra((n,))
>> FockState((n,))
>
> I think these were created as
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 9:50 PM, smichr wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Why do FockStateKet and FockStateBra print as FockState?
>
BKet((n,))
> FockState((n,))
BBra((n,))
> FockState((n,))
I think these were created as shorthand aliases. Probably not the
best decision.
> The Bra and K
Two questions:
1) Why do FockStateKet and FockStateBra print as FockState?
>>> BKet((n,))
FockState((n,))
>>> BBra((n,))
FockState((n,))
The Bra and Ket derive from FockState, so sympification of these
(misrepr-s) will fail to give the original object and are misleading
as to what one is dealing
I've made a number of bug fixes and added quite a few examples. Unless
there is a part that you don't like the api should be stable.
The issue about inclusion is
code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2845. I'll change the
milestone to 0.7.2. If you do not agree please comment
and change it in t
Well, I'm flattered that you liked it so much. I think it should be
restructured a little, though, if it is to be included anywhere (I
didn't write it with documentation in mind, just as a response to some
of the things that were said in this thread). And I do think that a
document describing how
In trying to derive Geometry from Basic I ran into a pickling problem
with `RegularPolygon(Point(1, 2), 4, 5, 0)`:
The directory of this object has `set(['_n', '_center', '_rot',
'_radius'])` whereas the pickled object does not. (This was found by
putting, in check, the line `set(d1) - set(d2)` ju
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Robert wrote:
> It looks like this bug was quickly fixed! Thanks.
Indeed! I wrote to create an issue right before going to bed, and when
I woke up, it was fixed.
>
> I appreciate the fast response. Generally what is the release process
> for this type of thing? I
It looks like this bug was quickly fixed! Thanks.
I appreciate the fast response. Generally what is the release process
for this type of thing? Is the best bet waiting for .7.2 to come out?
Thanks,
Rob
On Jan 11, 8:45 pm, "Alexey U. Gudchenko" wrote:
> 12.01.2012 03:14, Robert пишет:
>
> > did
Has the dust settled? Should https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/956
be committed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubsc
