Re: Issue 2863 in sympy: Plotting failures with SymPy-Bot

Comment #10 on issue 2863 by krastano...@gmail.com: Plotting failures with SymPy-Bot http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2863 I have been able to reproduce it over ssh on another machine. I have not done any bisecting to find why. This does NOT produce the error: In [2]:

Re: Issue 2863 in sympy: Plotting failures with SymPy-Bot

Comment #11 on issue 2863 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Plotting failures with SymPy-Bot http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2863 Well, that's not helpful: import pyglet pyglet.__version__ '$Id$' -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Issue 3025 in sympy: Piecewise evaluate=False does not work when conditions are boolean

Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3025 by sean.v@gmail.com: Piecewise evaluate=False does not work when conditions are boolean http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3025 Because bool's are not allowed in args, and without a Boolean

Re: Issue 2531 in sympy: Basic Boolean types (True, False, None)

Issue 2531: Basic Boolean types (True, False, None) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2531 This issue is now blocking issue 3025. See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3025 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue,

Re: Issue 3007 in sympy: Mul.flatten should filter out imaginary terms when oo is a factor

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #2 on issue 3007 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten should filter out imaginary terms when oo is a factor http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3007 No, i*j might be (-3*I)*(2*I). The coefficient of the imaginary term may have a sign as

Re: Issue 3005 in sympy: exp(I*oo*x) gives nan

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3005 by smi...@gmail.com: exp(I*oo*x) gives nan http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3005 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues group. To

Re: Issue 3003 in sympy: (-x*I*oo).coeff(I*oo) gives None

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3003 by smi...@gmail.com: (-x*I*oo).coeff(I*oo) gives None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3003 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 3000 in sympy: Abs doesn't process more than Rational from Mul arg

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3000 by smi...@gmail.com: Abs doesn't process more than Rational from Mul arg http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3000 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2998 in sympy: collect doesn't process powers with float coeff in exponent

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2998 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't process powers with float coeff in exponent http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2998 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2997 in sympy: collect mishandles power rules

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #4 on issue 2997 by smi...@gmail.com: collect mishandles power rules http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2997 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 2996 in sympy: collect doesn't collect power with numerical base

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2996 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't collect power with numerical base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2996 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2990 in sympy: Float is not pulled out of Mul base when exponent is Integer

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2990 by smi...@gmail.com: Float is not pulled out of Mul base when exponent is Integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2990 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2991 in sympy: commutative factors are not pulled out of a Mul base

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2991 by smi...@gmail.com: commutative factors are not pulled out of a Mul base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2991 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2988 in sympy: invalid expansion of Mul bases in Pow

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2988 by smi...@gmail.com: invalid expansion of Mul bases in Pow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2988 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2061 in sympy: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite recursion

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 2061 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite recursion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2061 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2878 in sympy: Add section to the Gotchas about floating point numbers

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #9 on issue 2878 by smi...@gmail.com: Add section to the Gotchas about floating point numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2878 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1707 in sympy: integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf() fails

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #4 on issue 1707 by smi...@gmail.com: integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf() fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1707 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1021 integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf()

Issue 3026 in sympy: Latex printing test failure in master

Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 3026 by sean.v@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026 I found this failure in master from test_latex.py. This error comes up on 2.7, 2.5 and 3.2 in

Re: Issue 3026 in sympy: Latex printing test failure in master

Comment #1 on issue 3026 by sean.v@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026 So looking at when things were committed and when Matthew's test was run, the test came before the commit, so this is likely an issue for 64-bit

Re: Issue 3026 in sympy: Latex printing test failure in master

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #2 on issue 3026 by smi...@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026 https://github.com/smichr/sympy/pull/new/3026 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 1053 in sympy: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5

Comment #17 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053 A way to choose battles you can win (with converting floats to Rationals) is to convert only those that are exact in base 2: if m = log(n)/log(2)

Re: Issue 1239 in sympy: decimals should be rationals (!)

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #1 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals (!) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239 with https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013 this is now: factor(x**2+Float('2.5')*x+1) 0.5*(1.0*x +

Re: Issue 2340 in sympy: Real(1) returns Integer

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #1 on issue 2340 by smi...@gmail.com: Real(1) returns Integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2340 Float(1) now returns 1.00 in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013 -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 1053 in sympy: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5

Comment #18 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053 Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 3026 in sympy: Latex printing test failure in master

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3026 by smi...@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 1239 in sympy: decimals should be rationals (!)

Comment #2 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals (!) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239 Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 1053 in sympy: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5

Comment #19 on issue 1053 by smi...@gmail.com: make sympify intelligent about 1/2 and 0.5 http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1053 (The math is wrong in comment 17, but the idea is right.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-issues

Re: Issue 1239 in sympy: decimals should be rationals (!)

Comment #3 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals (!) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239 In the pull request I cite, Floats store the instantiation value in _raw, so they could answer True for is_rational by seeing if _raw was a string or

Re: Issue 3007 in sympy: Mul.flatten should filter out imaginary terms when oo is a factor

Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #2 on issue 3007 by smi...@gmail.com: Mul.flatten should filter out imaginary terms when oo is a factor http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3007 No, i*j might be (-3*I)*(2*I). The coefficient of the imaginary term may have a sign as

Re: Issue 3005 in sympy: exp(I*oo*x) gives nan

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3005 by smi...@gmail.com: exp(I*oo*x) gives nan http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3005 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group.

Re: Issue 3003 in sympy: (-x*I*oo).coeff(I*oo) gives None

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3003 by smi...@gmail.com: (-x*I*oo).coeff(I*oo) gives None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3003 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 3000 in sympy: Abs doesn't process more than Rational from Mul arg

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 3000 by smi...@gmail.com: Abs doesn't process more than Rational from Mul arg http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3000 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2998 in sympy: collect doesn't process powers with float coeff in exponent

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2998 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't process powers with float coeff in exponent http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2998 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2996 in sympy: collect doesn't collect power with numerical base

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2996 by smi...@gmail.com: collect doesn't collect power with numerical base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2996 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 2990 in sympy: Float is not pulled out of Mul base when exponent is Integer

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2990 by smi...@gmail.com: Float is not pulled out of Mul base when exponent is Integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2990 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Issue 2991 in sympy: commutative factors are not pulled out of a Mul base

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2991 by smi...@gmail.com: commutative factors are not pulled out of a Mul base http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2991 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: Issue 2988 in sympy: invalid expansion of Mul bases in Pow

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #2 on issue 2988 by smi...@gmail.com: invalid expansion of Mul bases in Pow http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2988 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2061 in sympy: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite recursion

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #6 on issue 2061 by smi...@gmail.com: sqrt(-1.0*x) gives infinite recursion http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2061 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2878 in sympy: Add section to the Gotchas about floating point numbers

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #9 on issue 2878 by smi...@gmail.com: Add section to the Gotchas about floating point numbers http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2878 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are

Re: Issue 1707 in sympy: integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf() fails

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #4 on issue 1707 by smi...@gmail.com: integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf() fails http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1707 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1021 integrate(atan(x)**2, (x, -5, 5)).evalf()

Re: Issue 1239 in sympy: decimals should be rationals (!)

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #1 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals (!) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239 with https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013 this is now: factor(x**2+Float('2.5')*x+1) 0.5*(1.0*x +

Re: Issue 2340 in sympy: Real(1) returns Integer

Updates: Labels: NeedsReview smichr Comment #1 on issue 2340 by smi...@gmail.com: Real(1) returns Integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2340 Float(1) now returns 1.00 in https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1013 -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 3026 in sympy: Latex printing test failure in master

Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 3026 by smi...@gmail.com: Latex printing test failure in master http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3026 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: Issue 2340 in sympy: Real(1) returns Integer

Comment #2 on issue 2340 by smi...@gmail.com: Real(1) returns Integer http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2340 Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches group. To

Re: Issue 1239 in sympy: decimals should be rationals (!)

Comment #2 on issue 1239 by smi...@gmail.com: decimals should be rationals (!) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1239 Sorry, that request is at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/998. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy-patches

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

It's supposed to return sqrt(2)/pi. I get the result you post in master, and the correct result in my new branch gruntz. I take it you still get nan in the new branch? :/ On 24.01.2012 19:11, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Am 24.01.2012 17:53, schrieb Tom Bachmann: Executing the following two

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Am 24.01.2012 20:12, schrieb Tom Bachmann: It's supposed to return sqrt(2)/pi. I get the result you post in master, and the correct result in my new branch gruntz. I take it you still get nan in the new branch? :/ No, that was on master. What's the incantation to pull your branch? Do I need

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Just do git checkout -b test master git pull https://github.com/ness01/sympy gruntz [btw the correct answer is 2/sqrt(pi), contrary to what I said before. In any case, definitely not nan.] On 24.01.2012 19:53, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Am 24.01.2012 20:12, schrieb Tom Bachmann: It's

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

It passes here, now (the error_functions suite). I'll check your two expressions, though. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Here, the two expressions give: gruntz(gamma(x+1)/sqrt(2*pi)- exp(-x)*(x**(x+S(1)/2) + ... x**(x-S(1)/2)/12), x, oo) oo gruntz(exp(x)*exp(x**2)*(erf(x+1/exp(x))-erf(x)), x, oo) 2/sqrt(pi) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To post to

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Do you get oo, nan in master? [The error is only triggered under certain, apparently platform-dependent conditions.] On 24.01.2012 20:24, Chris Smith wrote: Here, the two expressions give: gruntz(gamma(x+1)/sqrt(2*pi)- exp(-x)*(x**(x+S(1)/2) + ... x**(x-S(1)/2)/12), x, oo) oo

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Am 24.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Tom Bachmann: Just do git checkout -b test master git pull https://github.com/ness01/sympy gruntz Okay, I wasn't aware that that URL would work. [btw the correct answer is 2/sqrt(pi), contrary to what I said before. In any case, definitely not nan.] Yes, with

Re: [sympy] functions/special/tests/test_error_functions now fails

Great, I'm submitting a pull request. Thanks for your help sorting this out. On 24.01.2012 20:38, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Am 24.01.2012 20:56, schrieb Tom Bachmann: Just do git checkout -b test master git pull https://github.com/ness01/sympy gruntz Okay, I wasn't aware that that URL would