Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3320 by smi...@gmail.com: fraction in denominator
missed by subs
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3320
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 3318 by smi...@gmail.com: failure in master
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3318
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues group.
To
Comment #4 on issue 3301 by julien.r...@gmail.com:
S.Integers.intersect(Interval) doesn't work for unbounded intervals
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3301
The pull has been merged. Should this issue be closed?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Comment #8 on issue 2210 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Sum does not set
commutativity
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2210
This pull was merged and this issue can probably be closed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Issue 2070: All elements of .args should be Basic
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2070
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Issue 2626: Piecewise should use a different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Issue 2626: Piecewise should use a different syntax for otherwise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2626
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2710.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC
Updates:
Blockedon: -sympy:2070 -sympy:2626 sympy:2070 sympy:2626
Comment #5 on issue 2710 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Cannot simplify Piecewise
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2710
This seems to have been fixed in the meantime:
In [13]: f = Piecewise((x*(x+y)-y*(x+y),
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 2210 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum does not set commutativity
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2210
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-issues
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #9 on issue 3322 by smi...@gmail.com: Another CSE bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3322
There is a fix at 1409 -- the failure of -(-1)**(1/4)*I to combine into
-(-1)**(3/4) is reason enough not to tweak as_base_exp. Tests
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/smichr/sympy 3322
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1409
-- Commit Summary --
* 3322: don't break apart I in Mul._eval_subs
-- File Changes --
M
Comment #8 on issue 2210 by julien.r...@gmail.com: Sum does not set
commutativity
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2210
This pull was merged and this issue can probably be closed.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 2210 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum does not set commutativity
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2210
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy-patches
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #9 on issue 3322 by smi...@gmail.com: Another CSE bug
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3322
There is a fix at 1409 -- the failure of -(-1)**(1/4)*I to combine into
-(-1)**(3/4) is reason enough not to tweak as_base_exp. Tests
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Sergiu Ivanov
unlimitedscol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found that sorting the args at creation time solves lots of problems. I
have not found that this sorting causes any performance issues
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sergiu Ivanov
unlimitedscol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Sergiu Ivanov
unlimitedscol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
I've found that sorting the args at creation time solves
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Chris Smith smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Sergiu Ivanov
unlimitedscol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Sergiu Ivanov
unlimitedscol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Rocklin
Hi I'm trying to integrate a function that is the derivative of
another function, but I get a long train of errors. The error is
really long but ends up withraise CoercionFailed(expected Number
object, got %s % a)
CoercionFailed: expected Number object, got +inf
My code:
from sympy import
Created the file commit on the branch kauers_algorithm. Then I tried
to push this commit with the command
git push origin kauers_algorithm
where origin is the address of sympy/sympy where we have to push
origin = https://github.com/sympy/sympy/
It was set by the command,
git remote set-url
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Saurabh Jha saurabh.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Created the file commit on the branch kauers_algorithm. Then I tried
to push this commit with the command
git push origin kauers_algorithm
where origin is the address of sympy/sympy where we have to push
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lewis lewis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I'm trying to integrate a function that is the derivative of
another function, but I get a long train of errors. The error is
really long but ends up withraise CoercionFailed(expected Number
object, got %s % a)
If I ever get around to getting integration3 merged, SymPy will be
able to do this integral.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chris Smith smi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lewis lewis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I'm trying to integrate a function that is the
On 10.07.2012 23:33, Aaron Meurer wrote:
If I ever get around to getting integration3 merged, SymPy will be
able to do this integral.
Why is that so difficult? (This is not an accusation, I'm just curious -
it seems to me full risch would improve sympy tremendously?)
--
You received this
24 matches
Mail list logo