Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3785 by peterj...@gmail.com: log(Rational(3,10),10) regression
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3785
At gitref `366591a`, the following runs without error:
Python 2.7.2 (default, Oct 11 2012, 20:14:37)
[GCC
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Labels: -EasyToFix
Mergedinto: 2440
Comment #7 on issue 3743 by smi...@gmail.com: dummy_eq fails with Sum
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3743
dummy_eq should not be used for comparing things with structural dummy
variables;
Comment #19 on issue 2440 by smi...@gmail.com: Equal Integrals compare
different when using different variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440
Issue 3743 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Issue 2440: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2566.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 2440
Blockedon: -sympy:2440 sympy:2440
Comment #7 on issue 2566 by smi...@gmail.com: Equating Sums shouldn't
depend on dummy variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Issue 2440: Equal Integrals compare different when using different variables
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2440
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2566.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2566
--
You received this message because you are listed in the
Updates:
Labels: smichr NeedsReview
Comment #1 on issue 3786 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum and Product subs problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3786
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2054
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com
Blocking: -sympy:2632 sympy:2632
Comment by julien.r...@gmail.com:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2045
Affected issues:
issue 2945: Make init_printing() work with latex printing in the IPython
qtconsole and
Issue 2832: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2832
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2961.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2961
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Issue 2832: bool(Relational) should raise ValueError
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2832
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:2961.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2961
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Updates:
Status: Started
Owner: julien.r...@gmail.com
Labels: NeedsReview
Blockedon: -sympy:2832 sympy:2832
Comment #2 on issue 2961 by julien.r...@gmail.com: __nonzero__ method of
Rel breaks solve of Piecewise functions
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3787 by kcris...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in sympy 0.7.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
See Sage issue http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13604
Apparently some of them were removed by
Comment #5 on issue 3056 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Closed-form results of
sums of meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3056
The second one gives
-π⋅(sinh(2⋅π⋅a⋅w) - cosh(2⋅π⋅a⋅w))
──
a
w/o any assumptions.
--
You
Comment #9 on issue 3057 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Closed form results for
meijerg functions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3057
First example returns:
___ ⎛(2⋅Si(a⋅w) - π)⋅sin(a⋅w) ⎞
-╲╱ 2 ⋅⎜ + cos(a⋅w)⋅Ci(a⋅w)⎟
⎝
Updates:
Status: Valid
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.3
Comment #1 on issue 3787 by asmeu...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in
sympy 0.7.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
Yep, I see them there in the tarball. Even if we don't figure out what
causes
Comment #2 on issue 3785 by peterj...@gmail.com: log(Rational(3,10),10)
regression
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3785
Solves my issue and looks good here - thanks =)
The only minor part I can't seem to explain is why the multiplicity method
signature now takes **kwargs
Comment #2 on issue 3787 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in
sympy 0.7.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
The issue #3445 should fix it.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You
Issue 3445: Automate the release process
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3445
This issue is now blocking issue sympy:3787.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Updates:
Blockedon: sympy:3445
Comment #3 on issue 3787 by asmeu...@gmail.com: DS_Store files still in
sympy 0.7.2
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3787
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #2 on issue 3786 by smi...@gmail.com: Sum and Product subs problems
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3786
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Comment by pniculq...@gmail.com:
When I write: python setup.py install
The terminal answer me: python: can't open file ´setup.py':[Errno 2] No
such file or directory
For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/wiki/DownloadInstallation
--
You received this message because you are
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 3788 by smi...@gmail.com: recognize special powers like
b**(1/log(b)) as E
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3788
log(-3, R(1,3))
-(log(3) + I*pi)/log(3)
solve((-3)**x-R(1,3)**_)
[log(3**(1 +
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3790 by asmeu...@gmail.com: log should handle separate bases
symbolically
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3790
Currently log(x, b) returns log(x)/log(b), but I think it should just stay
as log(x,
Status: Valid
Owner:
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium
New issue 3789 by asmeu...@gmail.com: log should handle separate bases
symbolically
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3789
Currently log(x, b) returns log(x)/log(b), but I think it should just stay
as log(x,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Thilina Rathnayake
thilina.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Aaron for your reply. I am proposing this as a GSoC project.
Sorry, I didn't mention it earlier. However, even if this is not accepted
as a
GSoC project, I would like to work on this.
OK. In that case,
This is a very good idea as it is face-to-face interactions are probably
much more faster than typing at IRC channel but yes different time-zones
would make this quite difficult in practice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To
Thanks Aaron for your very informative reply.
I will definitely take note of the points you have brought up.
Regards,
Thilina Rathnayake.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:51 PM, Thilina Rathnayake
thilina.r...@gmail.com
(I have now added a subsection on this in my melange proposal; see
summary of issues)
On 10.04.2013 20:52, Matthew Rocklin wrote:
It might be nice to have a couple representative bugs/issues. What are
the sorts of problems that we're facing?
What is a specific piece of code that would break?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:02 PM, sympy@googlegroups.com wrote:
Today's Topic Summary
Group: http://groups.google.com/group/sympy/topics
- Diophantine Equations Module #13e55909abc26344_group_thread_0 [4
Updates]
- GSoC 2013: Equation editor #13e55909abc26344_group_thread_1 [4
Hello,
My name is Joseph Stradling and I am a junior chemical cngineering student
transitioning into computer science at New Mexico Tech.
I am interested in improving the pattern matching and recognition as a
project for Google Summer of Code. I am currently trying to determine which
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Joseph Stradling
joseph.stradl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Joseph Stradling and I am a junior chemical cngineering student
transitioning into computer science at New Mexico Tech.
I am interested in improving the pattern matching and recognition as a
The time zone issue is relevant no matter what realtime medium is
used. We've always been able to work around it. People sleep for eight
hours and are awake for 16 hours, so there is always overlap in awake
time. At worst one party may have to wake up early or stay up late to
make it work.
Aaron
I wrote a class (see below) for a automatically updating dictionary.
For example let -
def xsq(x):
return(x*x)
D = auto_update_dict(xsq)
D[2] calls xsq and returns 4
call D[2] and xsq is not called since the previous call has called xsq
and placed
the result in the dictionary. Again 4
I suppose subs should be changed to just iterate over the entries.
Another option would be to create an object that implements __iter__
that returns (old, new) pairs. Does subs do this just for simplicity,
or does it need to have all the pairs at once before it can do the
substitution?
Aaron
When you give a dictionary the keys are unordered and to be canonical, the
keys are sorted.
What sort of expression are you wanting to do what type of substitution on?
Maybe replace, xreplace or Transform are better matches for what you want
to do.
--
You received this message because you are
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Joseph Stradling
joseph.stradl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
My name is Joseph Stradling and I am a junior chemical cngineering
student
transitioning into computer science at New Mexico
36 matches
Mail list logo