Re: [sympy] Test Failure

2013-09-01 Thread Thilina Rathnayake
Hi Ondrej, For some reason, Travis hasn't put the result of the test in front of the commit. Only the last build can be seen using the link provided by `Details` under the PR's Description. Here is the link to my last build. https://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/10869075 Regards, Thilina

Re: [sympy] Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Stephen Loo
Thanks Aaron and Thilina Aaron Meurer於 2013年9月1日星期日UTC+8下午11時33分46秒寫道: > > Unfortunately, the docs extensions were not converted to Python 3, so you > currently have to use the Python 2 version of Sphinx. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Stephen Loo > > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I

Re: [sympy] Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Stephen Loo
Thanks Aaron and Thilina. Where is the doc extension? Aaron Meurer於 2013年9月1日星期日UTC+8下午11時33分46秒寫道: > > Unfortunately, the docs extensions were not converted to Python 3, so you > currently have to use the Python 2 version of Sphinx. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Stephen Loo

Re: [sympy] Test Failure

2013-09-01 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Thilina Rathnayake wrote: > Hi All, > > Currently, this PR fails the travis build and sympy-bot tests. But when I > run the tests > locally, they all pass. I tried testing in both python2 and python3, still > the tests pass. I merged > the branch with the current ma

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Gilbert Gede wrote: > Check out this PR for a discussion of appropriateness of dummification: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1920 > > Here's the new PR with the correction: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2428 If I understand correctly, you are t

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Jason Moore
Why not just make dummification an optional argument to lambdify? The user can set it if they desire, otherwise the old behavior happens. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Gilbert Gede wrote: > Looks like in lambdify one of the checks for dummification is

Re: [sympy] SymPy and IPython

2013-09-01 Thread F. B.
Oh, I never noticed that before. I think it would be easier to make *isympy -I* or *isympy -ai* the default working mode, so it would be easier to use *isympy* as a CAS. On Sunday, September 1, 2013 5:30:00 PM UTC+2, Stefan Krastanov wrote: > > This is partly done in isympy, which I think uses I

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Gilbert Gede
Check out this PR for a discussion of appropriateness of dummification: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1920 Here's the new PR with the correction: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2428 On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Gilbe

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Gilbert Gede wrote: > Looks like in lambdify one of the checks for dummification is broken. I'll > open a PR in a minute here. > > The dummification was only supposed to happen on numerical translation > though, so modules='sympy' won't be fixed (or dictionari

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Gilbert Gede
Looks like in lambdify one of the checks for dummification is broken. I'll open a PR in a minute here. The dummification was only supposed to happen on numerical translation though, so modules='sympy' won't be fixed (or dictionaries). I don't know whether lambdify should always dummify or not t

Re: [sympy] Help understanding lambdify

2013-09-01 Thread Jason Moore
Matthew, This is definitely a bug. We should report in the ticketing system. The lines here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/sympy/utilities/lambdify.py#L279don't make a lot of sense to me. I'm not sure why the dummify is set to True only under those specific conditions. If dummify is

Re: [sympy] Re: Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Thilina Rathnayake
Hi Aaron, I can't recall how I installed it. I was just trying to see whether I get the same error as Stephen. Regards, Thilina On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I don't understand why it's using sage. How did you install sphinx? > > Aaron Meurer > > On Sep 1, 2013, at 7

Re: [sympy] Re: Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Aaron Meurer
I don't understand why it's using sage. How did you install sphinx? Aaron Meurer On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Thilina Rathnayake wrote: Hi Stephen, I tried to build the docs, I got a different kind of an error. $ make html mkdir -p _build/i18n/ mkdir -p _build/html/tutorial true mkdir -p src/

Re: [sympy] Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Aaron Meurer
Unfortunately, the docs extensions were not converted to Python 3, so you currently have to use the Python 2 version of Sphinx. Aaron Meurer On Sep 1, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Stephen Loo wrote: Hi all, I try to build document with current master, but got following message, $ make html mkdir -p _bui

Re: [sympy] SymPy and IPython

2013-09-01 Thread Stefan Krastanov
This is partly done in isympy, which I think uses Ipython when available. Check ./bin/isympy. On 1 September 2013 11:27, F. B. wrote: > I have to questions about SymPy and IPython: > > is it possible to configure IPython to autowrap Python's int? Like it is > already happening is Sage. > is it po

[sympy] SymPy and IPython

2013-09-01 Thread F. B.
I have to questions about SymPy and IPython: 1. is it possible to configure IPython to autowrap Python's *int*? Like it is already happening is Sage. 2. is it possible to automatically capture *NameError* and autodeclare missing variables as SymPy's *symbols() *? -- You received t

[sympy] Test Failure

2013-09-01 Thread Thilina Rathnayake
Hi All, Currently, this PR fails the travis build and sympy-bot tests. But when I run the tests locally, they all pass. I tried testing in both python2 and python3, still the tests pass. I merged the branch with the current master and again ran the test

[sympy] Re: Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Thilina Rathnayake
Hi Stephen, I tried to build the docs, I got a different kind of an error. $ make html mkdir -p _build/i18n/ mkdir -p _build/html/tutorial true mkdir -p src/.static mkdir -p _build/html mkdir -p _build/doctrees mkdir -p src/modules PYTHONPATH=..: sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees src _bui

[sympy] Build document

2013-09-01 Thread Stephen Loo
Hi all, I try to build document with current master, but got following message, $ make html mkdir -p _build/i18n/ mkdir -p _build/html/tutorial true mkdir -p src/.static mkdir -p _build/html mkdir -p _build/doctrees mkdir -p src/modules PYTHONPATH=..: sphinx-build -b html -d _build/doctrees src