Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #9 on issue 1010 by skirpic...@gmail.com: limit for 1/gamma(x) x-0
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1010
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium WrongResult Integration
New issue 4027 by sbmehta: incorrect evaluation of integral
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=4027
integrate(x**x, (x, 0, 1))
should yield -(sum((-n)**-n, (n, 0, 1))) == 0.7834305107... (i.e.,
Hi Aaron,
Thanks for the hints.
I tried Matrix.det() with methods berkowitz, bareis an det_LU
(docstring
lu_decomposition method is wrong) and still takes forever.
lu_decomposition takes 1 minute, but still it is too much for a diagonal
matrix.
I also tried using SparseMatrix.eigenvals()
Int[cos[a_.+b_.*x_], x_Symbol] := Sin[a+b*x] / b /; FreeQ[{a, b}, x]
Here *a* and *b* are matched if they do not contain *x*.
Well, I'm a bit confused, but I was just considering, when we call an
integration function:
*integrate(expression, x)*
we already know that *x* is the integration
I was trying to access the history of my isympy session, isympy had been
called with the -I parameter:
Out[23]
---
KeyError Traceback (most recent call last)
ipython-input-41-cf8df9fd2a29 in
Am 20.09.2013 22:49, schrieb F. B.:
Any thought at CINT for C++ developing?
http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint
This could help in order to avoid complications stemming from compilers.
A C/C++ interpreter does not help with GPU debugging problems.
Current-day graphic cards accept shader
Being written by physicists, CERN or no, isn't necessarily a sign of high
software quality.
Actually, it is a pretty reliable sign of bad quality ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote:
Am 20.09.2013 22:49, schrieb F. B.:
[...]
It was developed by physicists at CERN :)
Many physicists still love Fortran.
Because it is still the best language for the job, as long as you do
numerics. I use Fortran
