Hello,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Avichal Dayal avichal.da...@gmail.comwrote:
It would be great if you could look at my proposal (just an initial draft)
and give suggestions:-
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application-Avichal-Dayal-Series-Expansion
Formal Power Series:
I have posted my
proposalhttps://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application-Soumya-Dipta-Biswas:-First-Order-Logic.
Please suggest improvements.
Thank You
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On 14.03.2014 14:24, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Avichal Dayal avichal.da...@gmail.comwrote:
It would be great if you could look at my proposal (just an initial draft)
and give suggestions:-
On Friday, March 14, 2014 6:24:15 PM UTC+4, pr...@goodok.ru wrote:
Do you meant Laurent series?
Yep, sorry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On Thursday, March 13, 2014 7:29:40 PM UTC+4, brombo wrote:
If you are talking about Lagrangian field theory the question is how do
you take a derivative with respect to the field and the gradient of the
field and not with respect to the position vector the field is a function
of.
The
Another reminder for this. I will try to carve out some time this
weekend to give comments on applications, but I will not do it for any
application that is not on Melange. So please, everyone who plans to
apply, put what you've got so far on Melange. There are quite a few
people that I know what
I will post mine by today night on melange. The proposal should probably be
in its final draft then, so I wont have to change it much (I have my
quizzes next week, so in a bit of a time crunch for the next few days). The
formatting differences between wiki and melange are a pain though.
On
The formatting differences between wiki and melange are a pain though.
Yes, especially the part with code block.
On 14 March 2014 21:20, Sachin Joglekar srjoglekar...@gmail.com wrote:
I will post mine by today night on melange. The proposal should probably
be in its final draft then, so I
I posted mine on melange but it still is a draft and is not formatted.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to
Hey.
I have submitted my proposal as well (on melange).Kindly review when you
have the time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi!
I'm trying to simplify expressions in the form of a*b*c + d*e + f - g*h*h
+ i*a, basically the terms can be either added or subtracted and each term
is a product of some symbols.
For example, I would like to turn the expression:
a**4 - 4*a**3*b + 6*a**2*b**2 - 4*a*b**3 - a + b**4
On Friday, March 14, 2014 9:30:24 PM UTC+4, ecir...@gmail.com wrote:
3. If I knew that one term is in the form of (a - b), would the help?
Yes, for example:
In [2]: e = a**4 - 4*a**3*b + 6*a**2*b**2 - 4*a*b**3 - a + b**4
In [3]: e
Out[3]:
4 32 234
a - 4⋅a ⋅b
Respected Sir,
I am Rishabh Mishra,2nd yr undergrad B.E.(hons.) Chemical Engineering
student from Birla Institue of Technology and Science Pilani,Goa Campus.I
am new to python,but have a very sound background of java and c.I recently
got introduced to see about 4 months ago and was fascinated
Hi,
I am using the module nsolve of the SymPy package and want to refer to it
in a scientific article. Is there any convention how to cite it?
Thanks,
Stef
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
Am 14.03.2014 20:57, schrieb Steffi L:
Hi,
I am using the module nsolve of the SymPy package and want to refer to it
in a scientific article. Is there any convention how to cite it?
See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/README.rst#citation for
details.
--
You received this message
Jason's answer is probably the one to go with practically speaking.
Philosophically speaking though, module specific citations might be
interesting. Presumably these could be auto-generated. Maybe we could
hack up a little 'cite' function that returns bibtex for any module by
inspecting the git
Very cool idea. Having a tool that could build citations based on what
functionality you used in your paper would be interesting. The only issues
is where to draw the line on significant contributions and how far back in
the tree you go. Linus and Dennis Ritchie may have get the most citations
if
Hi Rishabh,
I had a really similar idea, and I would love to help you (though I cannot
mentor this summer)
1. The very little amount of heat/mass transfer that I've just read to pass
my grades requires solving for PDE's or ODE's numerically, if I'm not
wrong. Could you please be more specific
Solution of ODEs and PDEs numerically fits with SciPy, not Sympy.
sympy.physics.fluids and sympy.physics.thermodynamics would only make
sense for modules that support the derivation of equations in those
fields. That's what the mechanics and the quantum physics modules do.
Cheers,
Tim.
On
Am 14.03.2014 21:26, schrieb Jason Moore:
The only issues
is where to draw the line on significant contributions and how far back in
the tree you go. Linus and Dennis Ritchie may have get the most citations
if we're not careful.
Don't forget to cite Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī.
(I think
From Wikipedia:
The stated goals of the library are to become a full-featured computer
algebra system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_algebra_systemand...
From SymPy's tutorial heading
It aims to become a full-featured computer algebra system (CAS) while...
Are we not a
Ha, maybe instead of scraping out contributors to all technology related to
a *paper* we could limit ourselves to scraping out the contributors to a*
module *of a library. This seems more tractable :)
Heck though, if we wanted to give credit back to Muḥammad ibn Mūsā
al-Khwārizmī we could start
We are!
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
From Wikipedia:
The stated goals of the library are to become a full-featured computer
algebra system and...
From SymPy's tutorial heading
It aims to become a full-featured computer algebra system
Depends on how you define full featured. There are always more
things to do: more kinds of integrals to compute, more kinds of
equations to solve, more areas of mathematics that deserve treatment.
Even Mathematica is not full featured by this view.
But I think we definitely have what can be
I'm not pushing for version numbers. I'm just pushing for a language
change. In wiki spirit I'll just go ahead and edit the Wikipedia page when
I get home.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on how you define full featured. There are always more
Regarding the formatting issues: if you can't work around Melange
formatting, put a link to your proposal on the Wiki at the top of the
page (but still include the full proposal text in Melange). I was a
student two years, so I know quite well how painful formatting is in
their editor. We won't
Am 14.03.2014 23:07, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
Honestly, in my view, the only reason that we should continue to keep
the 0 in the front of the version number is the assumptions. Once we
get that fixed, we should release SymPy 1.0. But what do I know. Maybe
SymPy 1.0 should be released now, and when
Historically, the purpose of the 0 has not been features but API
stability. That's my main motivation for waiting for the assumptions.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote:
Am 14.03.2014 23:07, schrieb Aaron Meurer:
Honestly, in my view, the
ThankYou for the reply.
I want to add libraries for directly solve eqations of navier's stoke and
other's using some standard data, ad calculation of pressure drops for a
flow across the pipe.
As mentioned by Tim, if this doesn't fall under SymPy then maybe i should
move this discussion to
Hello everyone. I have updated my proposal as per extensive inputs from
Jason and Gilbert. It's been decided that retaining ReferenceFrame and
Point as two different classes is more advantageous than combining them
into a cluttered 'MovingRefFrame' class.
The most important part of the project
Solving Navier-Stokes involves solving a system of PDEs numerically, so
that falls outside Sympy. As for calculation of pressure drops for flow
across a pipe, those aren't even close to enough for a GSoC project.
To be honest, Navier-Stokes doesn't really fit too well with SciPy as
it's kind
The copyright of SymPy is SymPy Development Team, so that's who you
should cite. The full team is listed in AUTHORS.
Aaron Meurer
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
Ha, maybe instead of scraping out contributors to all technology related to
a paper we
I think at least ii is already implement.
The patch submission deadline is the same as the proposal deadline.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Kundan Kumar
kundankumar18...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to discuss the topic that I want to implement in sympy in gsoc
2014.
I
Don't forget there is also a patch requirement. See
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/gsoc-2014-application-template.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Vamsi Kurama vamsi.kur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Firstly I would like to thank the Sympy for making the the library
Sorry for the late reply. You should take a look at the work that is
being done at https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2508.
Also remember that for GSoC there is a patch requirement (pardon me if
you already submitted one; I'm still sifting through emails).
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, RAJAT AGGARWAL
rajataggarwal1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I was working on the other parts of the sympy code, to understand the much
part of it so that i can have ideas for this project that how we can reduce
new step_eval functions to implement step-by-step
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote:
Some comments:
- In general, you can only use the Jacobian if you have an unconstrained
system and the operating point is zero. If the operating point is not zero,
then you need the full linear portion of the Taylor
Bronstein's book is probably overkill, but probably an intro paper to
the algorithm wouldn't hurt.
Aaron Meurer
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 PM, someone someb...@bluewin.ch wrote:
Hi,
Although understanding at least the basics of the Risch algorithm
should help too, as the Karr algorithm is
Thank you Ondrej and Tim for your inputs. I too think we should concentrate
on Symbolic matrix manipulation rather than the numerical matrices since
there
are good libraries we can use to do them.
The approach used in Armadillo is that if the user is willing to install
additional
libraries it
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Thilina Rathnayake
thilina.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you Ondrej and Tim for your inputs. I too think we should concentrate
on Symbolic matrix manipulation rather than the numerical matrices since
there
are good libraries we can use to do them.
The approach
40 matches
Mail list logo
