Hello,
I was going through how ProductSet is implemented and couple of things
struck me as odd. First, the string/repr representation:
s = FiniteSet(1, 2)
t = FiniteSet(2, 3)
p = ProductSet(s, t)
p
{1, 2} x {2, 3}
IMO, a product set is a set (at least Wikipedia tells me so). So,
shouldn't
I want to add widgets in SymPyGamma so that user can:
1) Share a particular card or the entire result by creating a GIST as
IPython Notebook.
I have already done significant work on this issue, ( which i left in
the middle due to my gsoc proposal ). So, i need to finish that so that it
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:18:41 PM UTC+4, Amit Saha wrote:
IMO, a product set is a set (at least Wikipedia tells me so). So,
shouldn't it rather be the following?
{(1,2), (1,3), (2,2), (2,3)}
1) It *is* a set:
In [8]: isinstance(p, Set)
Out[8]: True
2) Yes, maybe for FiniteSet -
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Sergey Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 5:18:41 PM UTC+4, Amit Saha wrote:
IMO, a product set is a set (at least Wikipedia tells me so). So,
shouldn't it rather be the following?
{(1,2), (1,3), (2,2), (2,3)}
1) It *is* a
Hey.
I modified my branch.It now calculates maximal span from all lines.
Thanks for checking it out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hi Sahil,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:33 AM, SAHIL SHEKHAWAT
sahilshekhawa...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to add widgets in SymPyGamma so that user can:
1) Share a particular card or the entire result by creating a GIST as
IPython Notebook.
I have already done significant work on this issue,
Thanks Ondřej for confirming! I am working on the gui right now. Will soon
send a PR.
Thanks!!
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 11:12:03 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
Hi Sahil,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:33 AM, SAHIL SHEKHAWAT
sahilshe...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
I want to add
If the set itself is unevaluated as a product, then it should print that way.
The main concern with evaluating such sets automatically would be that
they can get quite large compared to the size of the original sets.
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Amit Saha amitsaha...@gmail.com
Note that for the math, zooming is already supported directly in
MathJax (right click on the math).
Aaron Meurer
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:53 PM, SAHIL SHEKHAWAT
sahilshekhawa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Ondřej for confirming! I am working on the gui right now. Will soon
send a PR.
Thanks!!
On 21.03.2014 21:23, deepak goel wrote:
sorry its late i know here is my proposal
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2014-Application-Deepak-Goel:-Asymptotic-Expansion
i m late for pr too but would get them done by announcement date
actually i was working on propasal and related papers
I am aware of the fact! Thanks @aaron for pointing that out.
I want to embed all the pre-existing things which we are calculating anyway
(or are a part of the languages which we are using like you pointed out),
into a widget so that the user can have options to use the result in the
way he thinks
Its really nice that you pointed it out! i really appreciate that everyone
is helping me. Thanks @certik and @aaron
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:07 AM, SAHIL SHEKHAWAT sahilshekhawa...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am aware of the fact! Thanks @aaron for pointing that out.
I want to embed all the
If you want the fully evaluated FiniteSet of pairs then call FiniteSeton
the ProductSet. This works because ProductSets iterate through all of the
elements.
s = FiniteSet(1, 2)
t = FiniteSet(2, 3)
p = ProductSet(s, t)
FiniteSet(p)
{(1, 2), (1, 3), (2, 2), (2, 3)}
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at
Well Thanks Aaron for informing me about that. Though its little late as
now I cant edit my proposal.
But I went through the PR, method of implementation of some of system of
ode have already been proposed and coded by Krastanov. Though, as you
pointed out, it need some modifications and
This has come up a few times recently. I'd like to bring this topic up for
serious discussion.
I have created an issue here https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/7339
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com wrote:
This has come up a few times recently. I'd like to bring this topic up for
serious discussion.
I have created an issue here https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/7339
I took the liberty to extend your issues with some
Awesome. Please consider the top space wiki space.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Ondřej Čertík ondrej.cer...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Matthew Rocklin mrock...@gmail.com
wrote:
This has come up a few times recently. I'd like to bring this topic up
for
serious
17 matches
Mail list logo
