I haven't moved to 0.7.6 yet, so I'm still using 0.7.5.
I'm trying to create a custom subclass of Function, which is sure to emit
more questions later, but for now the question is: "how do I the
LatexPrinter to display it as anything but name(x,y)"? It looks like
that's the behavior if there i
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sergey Kirpichev
> wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, November 21, 2014 12:49:40 AM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>>
>>> A few I'd like to propose:
>>
>>
>> New solve is another important stuff for 1.0, see
>> https://
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Sergey Kirpichev
wrote:
> On Friday, November 21, 2014 12:49:40 AM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> A few I'd like to propose:
>>
>
> New solve is another important stuff for 1.0, see
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7523
>
>
>> - mpmath should be made a depe
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Am 20.11.2014 um 22:49 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
> > Other submodules are not as obvious to me for splitting as this one,
> > but we can discuss things. Again, I want to be cautious here, because
> > any submodule that is not entirely isolat
On Friday, November 21, 2014 12:49:40 AM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> A few I'd like to propose:
>
New solve is another important stuff for 1.0, see
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/7523
> - mpmath should be made a dependency of SymPy (it should no longer be
> bundled). Let's wait until
Am 20.11.2014 um 22:49 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
> Other submodules are not as obvious to me for splitting as this one,
> but we can discuss things. Again, I want to be cautious here, because
> any submodule that is not entirely isolated will end up being a
> dependency of SymPy if it is split out.
H
Now that 0.7.6 is out the door, I'd like to open this thread to
discuss some of the future plans for SymPy. I think it's high time we
released a 1.0 version. SymPy has come a long way in the past ten
years. It's now stable, very featureful, and fairly well tested and
documented.
That isn't to say
I'm happy to announce that SymPy 0.7.6 has been released. The release
notes for this release are at
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/release-notes-for-0.7.6 and the
docs are at http://docs.sympy.org/latest/index.html.
You can download this release from
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/releases/ta
Hi Shyam,
Welcome. Please have a look at this document-
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/introduction-to-contributing
Saurabh
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:46 PM, shyam gupta wrote:
> hey i am shyam tayal ,doing b.tech from computer science, i am python
> programmer,,, i love maths much ,, i l
I fixed one issue. The ones in benchmarks are run just by running the
scripts.
The rest I ran with
from __future__ import print_function
def benchit(m):
mod, name = m.rsplit('.', 1);b = getattr(__import__(mod,
fromlist=[name]), name)
for f in dir(b):
if f.startswith('bench') or f
hey i am shyam tayal ,doing b.tech from computer science, i am python
programmer,,, i love maths much ,, i liked the idea of sympy very much and
i want to contribute to it,,
can anyone guide me ,,,what to do and where to start..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
You might wish to be more general and implement vector analysis as a
function of a metric tensor. See the following link -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvilinear_coordinates#Vector_operations
On 11/19/2014 10:34 PM, Lukas Zorich wrote:
Thanks Jason!
El miércoles, 19 de noviembre de 2014 1
On Thursday, November 20, 2014 12:09:46 AM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Thanks for everyone for testing this. I haven't heard of any issues so I
> will do the final release tomorrow. If anyone else was planning on testing
> this, please do so now.
>
Are we sure that our benchmarks work:
http
13 matches
Mail list logo
