I have been relieved to find something which I can finally work on. I am
happy how well documented it is. The result is I have set up the
environment and finally ready to work on it.
Let's get started.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
Hello!
This is going to be a rather long post, so I'll first explain what I'm
trying to do - then list all the essentially unsuccessful ways I tried
so far.
Basically, my long-term goal is to build a database of high-school level
physics equations (dynamics, energy, electromagnetism, waves, ...)
I want to use the latex function without calculating the input. For
instance if I do latex((2+3)/7) the answer comes out as 5/7, when I want it
to come out as (2+3)/7 (with latex).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from t
Hi Petr,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This is going to be a rather long post, so I'll first explain what I'm
> trying to do - then list all the essentially unsuccessful ways I tried
> so far.
>
> Basically, my long-term goal is to build a database of high-schoo
Here is one way to do it:
https://gist.github.com/moorepants/858503aa180df60a7829
But solve is returning an empty list. I'm not sure why that isn't working.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ondřej Čertík
wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 2:
I had a sign error. The code works now.
Btw, sympy.physics.mechanics is likely overkill for high school physics.
You can use it to solve these kinds of problem, but the overhead is high.
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Jason Moore wrote:
> Here is one
>>> latex(S('(2+3)/7',evaluate=False))
'\\frac{1}{7} \\left(2 + 3\\right)'
On Monday, February 16, 2015 at 8:40:47 AM UTC-6, zel noth wrote:
>
> I want to use the latex function without calculating the input. For
> instance if I do latex((2+3)/7) the answer comes out as 5/7, when I want it
> to
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 3:29:00 AM UTC+9, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
>
> > (A) Most naive and least flexible approach - define functions s(t) and
> v(t),
> > build some simple equations around them and then ask for definition
> > of v(t) given that s(t) = x_0:
> >
> > impo
