I roughly understand why assumptions are needed. In my mind: so that
sympy knows what the numerical values the symbol can assume. Is that a
right way of thinking about it?
It's one (correct) way of thinking about it.
Another way would be: The set of rules that restrict the values the
symbol
Yes, this is what drew me to Sympy in the first place!
Now, I have the need to evaluate multivariate versions and wanted to work
from that existing base. I've been looking at the code, in order to start
hacking the multivariate stuff, but wanted ask if anyone has already
started/done such a
I don't see anything searching through the pull requests, and I don't
recall anyone saying they were, so I guess no. There are several pull
requests related to other special functions (esp.
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pulls/raoulb), but I don't see anything
for Fox H or Meijer G.
Also, is the
It doesn’t appear to handle the multivariate case (e.g. as defined here
http://www.dli.gov.in/data_copy/upload/INSA/INSA_1/20005b91_616.pdf for
two vars).
On Thursday, April 16, 2015 at 10:36:27 AM UTC-5, Aaron Meurer wrote:
I don't see anything searching through the pull requests, and I
Thanks Jim! That all sounds great to me and seems like a major improvement.
Rock and Roll!
Jason
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:40 PM, James Crist crist...@umn.edu wrote:
As of this writing, SymPy has 1648 issues open. That's more than numpy,
scipy, or pandas
As of this writing, SymPy has 1648 issues open. That's more than numpy,
scipy, or pandas (more than numpy and scipy combined!). Further, our issue
tagging system is a mess. We can do better than this!
Many of these issues are imported from google code, and may be already
fixed in master (some
