[sympy] Solvers for SymEngine

hello, I am Kush Singh , 1st year B.Tech Comp. Science student from Thapar University Patiala. I understand there is a need to develop libraries written in python ( SymPy ) to run faster in c++ ( SymEngine ) . I feel I can best rewrite solvers() written in SysPy to SysEngine( written in c++ )

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.0 release candidate 1 ready for testing

I see. I think this is coming from the code that runs the sage tests. I pushed a fix. Aaron Meurer On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Ondřej Čertík >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2016: Singularity Functions

Jason, Yah, That would be great. After drafting my proposal on wiki, I will let you know. Regards Sampad Kumar Saha Mathematics and Computing I.I.T. Kharagpur On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 4:31 AM, SAMPAD SAHA wrote: > > Yah, That would be great. After drafting my proposal on wiki, I will let > you

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2016: Singularity Functions

Seems reasonable. I recommend drafting up a python session like you have there showing the desired functionality. You can make this part of your proposal on the wiki. Once you have a reasonable amount of material we can discuss further. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Thu, Mar 3, 2016

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2016: Singularity Functions

Jason, Thanks. I will go through the printing packages. Will it be ok if we add the module for singularity function in sympy/functions/special ? And I am thinking to do like this: There will be class which will be taking power and offset as argument e.g. f = singularityFunc(power , offset , va

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.0 release candidate 1 ready for testing

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Ondřej Čertík > wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Ondřej Čertík >> wrote: >>> Hi Aaron, >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: The SymPy 1.0 release candidate 1 is ready

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC idea for a project: holonomic functions

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:45 AM, wrote: > Hi, > > I have a few questions. > Would this project also involve representing holonomic sequences ? (in the > case that one would want to obtain a relation for the Taylor series > coefficients which essentially forms a holonomic sequence). In that case, >

[sympy] Gsoc 2016

Sir I am Satyabrata Rout,CSE,IIIT-Bhubaneswar,Odisha,India.I want to contribute to the series expansion project on sympy.I am a new developer currently I am pursuing my B-Tech 2nd year.I have strong back ground in mathematics.Please help me to proceed in this project. Thank you Satyabrata Rout

Re: [sympy] SymPy 1.0 release candidate 1 ready for testing

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Ondřej Čertík > wrote: >> Hi Aaron, >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >>> The SymPy 1.0 release candidate 1 is ready for testing. Please >>> download and test it, and report any is

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

This post is with regards to the *Set Infrastructure* part of the project idea. After reading a few resources and the ``sets`` module, I would like to know about a few of these points: - Handling multidimensional sets The Ideas Page states that we need to implement few functions to handle

[sympy] Re: GSOC 2016: Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with C++

Jason, Thank you for the guidance. I 'll start the work as soon as possible. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To pos

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2016: Singularity Functions

After you create some objects that represent the functions you will need to add functionality to the various printers that we have. See the sympy printing packages for examples. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:55 AM, SAMPAD SAHA wrote: > Jason , > > > Suppose I

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2016: Singularity Functions

Jason , Suppose I want to print **2 in isympy asraised to 2 . How we can do it? Regards Sampad Kumar Saha Mathematics and Computing I.I.T. Kharagpur On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:29 AM, SAMPAD SAHA wrote: > Jason , > > Sorry, actually I didn't notice that I haven't added the list in cc. It

[sympy] Re: Regarding Code Generation with Sympy

Thank you, Jason, for the reply. I went through the notes put up on the wiki and the optimizations that are required through code generation . I also looked through the pull request #10486

[sympy] express groebner basis polynomials as combination of input polynomials?

After building a Groebner basis with g = sympy.groebner([f1, f2, ...], ...) is there a way to describe the elements of the basis (g.polys) as a combination of the [f1, f2, ...]? (I.e., figure out how the Groebner basis was derived?) (Context: I'm trying to express a polynomial f as a combinati

[sympy] Contributing to Sympy (GSoC and in general)

Hello everyone, My name is Rohit Kumar Jena. Currently, I am a first year undergraduate in Computer Science in the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Bombay. I would like to contribute to sympy by implementing new features in it. I have a pretty good idea in mind, as I think. I have gone thr

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2016: Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with C++

Aravind, In sympy.physics.mechanics we have the KanesMethod and LangrangesMethod classes. For large problems with many degrees of freedom these take a substantial amount of time to compute. There is a N-link pendulum model in the PyDy package that can easily show this. See the graph near the botto

[sympy] GSOC 2016: Classical Mechanics: Efficient Equation of Motion Generation with C++

Hi all, I am Aravind from IIIT-Hyderabad, India. I am new to open source contribution. From last week I have been working the issues of sympy in github. I will be applying to GSoC this year from Sympy. I have gone through various topics mentioned in the Ideas Page. Out of all I liked Classical

Re: [sympy] GSOC 2016: Assumptions

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 9:52:43 PM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Your list looks spot on. The speed of refine is a very important issue. > > Regarding the inconsistencies, I think the one you mention is the main > one left. If there are any others they are relatively minor. > Thank y