[sympy] Getting Started with Contributing/Patching

2017-03-15 Thread sheil3677
I'm trying to get involved with SymPy, but I'm having trouble figuring out where to start. I've already read the tutorial and development workflow pages, forked SymPy in Github, and cloned the code to my machine, and next I would like to work on fixing a bug or making a patch. However, when I l

Re: [sympy] 1.0.1 point release?

2017-03-15 Thread Aaron Meurer
We do want to do a release, but unfortunately, unless we have some people volunteer to help, it may be a while, as there are some things that need to be done first. Aaron Meurer On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Are there plans for a point release of sympy?

[sympy] GSOC IDEA: Fourier Optics

2017-03-15 Thread ankur maheshwari
I would like to propose an idea to add Fourier optics functionality to the already existing physics.optics package. The current package is based on Newtonian Optics and Par-axially Approximated Optics which work only for specific usecases. Adding Fourier analysis to the package would help in so

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC Idea: Rubi integrator

2017-03-15 Thread Abdullah Javed Nesar
Hi, Adding new rules would surely add on to Rubi's usability, we can handles a larger number of cases. Side by side care should always be taken to modify the if-then-else tree which is root of Rubi's performance. I think the way Francesco presents seems good to me. What do you people think? if

[sympy] 1.0.1 point release?

2017-03-15 Thread Nico Schlömer
Hi everyone, Are there plans for a point release of sympy? I'm eager for it because of the (fixed) regression [1]. Cheers, Nico [1] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/12132 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this